• @CTDummy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    112 months ago

    I though it was post hoc, ergo propter hoc? After the fact, therefore because of the fact?

    • @nahuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yeah, that’s what I mean.

      The person I was responding to was comparing it to cum hoc which means that the two events being considered simultaneously, which I don’t think is correct.

      • @CTDummy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Wait, cum has Latin roots? How the fuck is this how I find that out? Hahaha, cheers for the elaboration. IT CHANGES EVERYTHING