Hi there,

I’ve started using Mullvad Browser recently(switched from Brave) and really like it.

I turn on browser history when using it and was wondering if this would be kind of defeating the point? Obviously I’d get the other security benefits from the hardening done, but should I just use vanilla Firefox?

Interested to hear people’s opinions!

    • @bashrcOP
      link
      English
      711 months ago

      Effectively yeah. It’s the Tor Browser without the Tor 😂

    • @SatyrSack
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      Same. At first I thought they were referring to the mobile browser Mull.

  • @epyon22@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I guess it depends on your risk tolerance?

    How sensitive is your browsing history?

    how many people have access to your account or root access?

    How many people have access to the device under a different account?

    Are you concerned about cyber attacks?

    Are concerned about the device getting confiscated/stolen by another party?

    If the answers to these questions are low risk then you basically have very little problems with keeping history on your device. Remember your isp/VPN will be able to see DNS calls and ip address connections which best case scenario will expose the websites you go to.

    • @bashrcOP
      link
      English
      111 months ago

      Good points. Thanks!

  • If having browser history on helps you use it, I think it shouldn’t be a huge issue. I have been using mullvad browser the way I use Firefox focus on the phone. Quick searches for stuff or just browsing casually.

    I have a separate Firefox browser for personal stuff.

  • @PublicLewdness@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 months ago

    I use Abrowser which is a fork of Firefox that removes some sketchy features and has better default settings. Didn’t know that Mullvad had a browser. I’d at least consider it.

  • @jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Mullvad and Tor browser go to some lengths to keep data from touching the disk to reduce residual footprints on the system after they are closed.

    If your happy to have a stored history on disk, go for it, your not hurting anything.

    Mullvad is still a improvement, I consider it easier to run Mullvad then get Firefox, setup Arkenfox, and fiddle with all the settings until I’m happy with the fingerprint. With Mullvad browser it just works out of the box.

  • @MajesticFlame
    link
    English
    111 months ago

    I use Mullvad as a sort of incognito tab while using Firefox for most normal stuff. I don’t think there would be any issue with using Mullvad with history, but there is not much point for services where you reveal your identity by logging in anyway unless you make sure your login is not connected to you.