• dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The irony of “all billionaires bad” is that Taylor Swift earned that money through album sales and live touring. She wasn’t actively exploiting the labor of workers in order to be rich, she is just that popular.

      And before everyone jumps down my ass about my opinion sounding too conservative for Lemmy, I invite you to check out my post history.

      • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        97
        ·
        10 months ago

        The thousands of people making those records sell and shows happen:

        There is no self made billionaire, a billion is an absurd amount of wealth a singular person cannot actually earn or be worth.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          10 months ago

          “To make apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe” ~Carl Sagan

          • He’s talking about all the people working at the label and concert agency. Do you think the technicians and riggers whot take care of all the audio, light and show effects get more money at her concerts? What about the people doing the security, check-in, cleaning and so on?

            Try having a concert without any of these. There is hundreds of people working to make stadion concerts happen.

            • nexguy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              10 months ago

              … they do that for all the acts… doesn’t have much to do with how rich any particular performer is.

              • Clubbing4198@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                24
                ·
                10 months ago

                it absolutely does. every single worker that works under any labor agreement is making less than what their labor is worth. capitalism only works when you can make money off of how much someone is worth and not pay them the full amount. there is no incentive in capitalism to pay people what they are truly worth because that would mean no profit. she also profits off of countless years of technological advancements made by underpaid workers that allow her to have the production value and presence she has. i really find it hard to believe that people can’t just see the plainness of how this labor thing works. why would anyone start a business if they couldnt profit off of their workers?

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  What you are saying is generally true in practice, but not an absolute feature of labor agreements. In the simplest case, two people working together can create more value/profit than each working individually.

                  A genius programmer and a genius game designer will do better together than apart, and there are a lot of reasons why they might organize so that one owns the business and the other takes a paycheck. Add in a graphic artist, an audio engineer, etc, and they are probably not all interested in becoming part of the business.

                  On the other side of the scale are publicly owned corporation where holding stock has nothing to do with generating value or profits. That is the heart of what makes capitalism capitalism, when the possession of sufficient capital produces leverage over workers and inherently unfair compensation.

              • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Your arguement was, she wouldn’t exploit other peoples labor. But in fact she does very much so.

                She would be nothing without the labor of all those people, yet they see scarps of what she makes.

              • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                i have no idea, but it’s not Taylor swift that’s selling those tickets for that much, it’s ticketmaster/stubhub and the like. she likely gets X amount from the venue to play there and the ticket sales all go to the venue. that’s the way it worked at the 4 day music festivals I’ve worked at. we paid the performers X amount, that had ZERO to do with how much we were charging for tickets. They got no portion of our sales.

                • Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  That’s how it is. Artists from the calibre of TS get a fixed amount of money for a complete tour contract from the tour management. Regardless how many tickets are sold or whatever the tickets cost. The tour management is responsible to manage everything with the venues, the ticket sale companies, and all subcontractors like stage riggers etc.

      • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        What a sad state of affairs that you feel the need to “defend” yourself by claiming you’re not conservative. What the hell happened that we can’t have differing opinions without making blanket disclaimers?

        • maniclucky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          At least here in the US, conservatism is associated with pretty much nothing good. Elimination of trans people (and then da gays after that), more guns, less healthcare, less education, less vaccines, less social responsibility, more taxes for the poor, less taxes for the rich, jailing people for getting abortions, furthering wars that we can feed our soldiers to for money, insurrection and fascism, fox news.

          Distancing yourself from that dumpster fire is prudent.

          Edit: The social responsibility thing was a dumb one. I was thinking of something else. Disregard that one point.

          • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            lumping everyone who believes part of those is not prudent either. I believe in thinking for one’s self. I believe in live and let live. You have ever right to be offended, but being offended means fuck all. I believe 2A is integral to our country and protects the rest of the constitution. I believe in more healthcare. our system is broken. but you can’t just flip a switch either. the system would collapse. I believe vaccines should be up to the individual, but the people making the vaccines shouldn’t make record profits off of them. They should also publish all their testing data and what EXACTLY is in them. We shouldn’t be forced to take anything. I don’t know what you mean about less social responsibility. I don’t know a single conservative that preaches more taxes for the poor. I think there needs to be a closing of tax loopholes so corporations pay their share, and the rich are not able to ‘hide’ money offshore. abortions should be legal up until the third trimester, except in cases of danger to the mother. If you simply can’t make up your mind in 6 months, then you likely have bigger issues. I think we shouldn’t hand out money in foreign aid and we should use that money to house, feed and educate our own population before we hand it out willy nilly all over the globe. if we are going to use the farce that our tax dollars are for defense, then let’s DEFEND our country, not bomb brown people and let any Juan, Mohammed, and Larry walk across our southern border in hordes and droves. Immigration is fine, but there’s a reason we have a limit. I think you should have to show a govt issued ID to vote IN PERSON and I think that ID should be free. I think there should be voting stations in every HS auditorium. Legalize 420, and let’s consider legalizing all drugs. Let the gays be gay, idgaf who you marry. While I think 90% of ‘trans’ people have a mental condition, who am I to tell them what to do with their body? I think it’s dumb af to cut off your tits or dick. But hey, it’s your body. But if you present as a man, but “identify” as a woman, how the fuck is anyone supposed to know? Put some effort into it Ze, Zam, Chaz, whatever. The world doesn’t revolve around you and your pronouns, get over it. I think pedophiles should be executed on public television. I think the people that brazenly do these “smash mob” style thefts should be put in stocks and publically humiliated. I think people like you misuse words like “fascist”, “Nazi”, “Insurrection”, and “Racist” not because you understand the meaning of them, but because they illicit a response that gives you the feeling of moral superiority.

            Ultimately I believe that MOST people fall somewhere in between the left and right and it’s just the screaming extremes that make each side look terrible to the other. It’s also that screaming extreme on either side that shames people into agreeing with them, exactly how you seem to be doing in your post. Calling a group of people a “dumpster fire” because they have an R or a D next to their name is extremely naive and childish and just as dangerous and you seem to think people that don’t think like you are.

            • maniclucky@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              In full recognition that I am similarly guilty, bullet points would make that digestible. Just a consideration.

              So lets both distill this down. I can kinda spot a few agreement points in there (taxes, don’t be a dick to LBGT folks) and a dissonance between the voter and the representative (see: the last time R’s got a big tax bill. More taxes for the poor, fewer taxes for the rich) which is similar for both parties (arguably more severe on one side, but I digress).

              2A, immigration, taxes. These are all legit political discussion points and would be so much better to discuss than whatever culture war nonsense is going on. That don’t actually get addressed by legislature (see: R’s, this week, throttling their own border bill to make Biden look bad. They explicitly described it as such, so clearly they don’t actually care, but when did we expect them to).

              There is no conspiracy to place Taylor Swift at the super bowl. Fauci did not do… whatever it was the crazies accused him of (D’s had a good number of crazies there to be fair). The border crisis is a nothing burger (not to say immigration reform isn’t a thing, just the hype). These are the talking points I hear from the R’s. How am I supposed to take them seriously. Especially when I, as a gay man, am expressly on the list of things they want to make illegal?

              I watched January 6th. On their streams, it was right there. I imagine it was a big day for Twitch and others like it. There was no question what was happening, and many people have explicitly gone to jail for insurrection. This is not debatable. It has been adjudicated in court. And Trump told them he loves them and that they should “stand by”. I watched it live. Some number of them were rubes that were tricked* but there were people setting up a damned gallows and shouting for Pence’s neck. Even if the rubes didn’t like it, mob mentality is a well studied and powerful thing. It was an insurrection. A relatively pitiful one, but that’s what it was.

              Trump has expressly stated he wants to be a dictator ‘just for a few days’ at the start of his term. Because that’s how that works… He wants to jail reporters and political opponents. There is no shortage of statements that are about as undemocratic as you can possibly be. Tell me how he isn’t a fascist?

              Even if you don’t like Trump, the R’s have fallen in line behind him. I’m not talking average people, plenty of people are conservative and don’t support all that nonsense. But the legislature isn’t the people. And it’s full of people that are challenging each other to duels on the floor of congress and shit (I think it was a state congress, but still). MTG and Boebert eat up air time with their crazy. Gym Jordan is a crazy fucker who was an accessory to sexual assault. The current speaker sends notifications to his son every time his masturbates. This list goes on.

              So yeah, in normal times, I’d agree that judging by R or D is a bad move and that generalizations are bad as a rule. Both sides are using their positions to enrich themselves so it’s not like there’s any high ground to go around. But damn me if I’m not voting for anyone that associates with the side that would rather my loving committed relationship to another man be illegal for… reasons?

              Side note: neopronouns are a non-issue. I’m an active member of my LGBT community in a major city and I’ve never met one. And using someone’s new pronouns (on the subject of trans folks) is just a matter of being polite and is not onerous, most only get pissed if you purposefully use their pronouns incorrectly. Worst I’ve had is being corrected when the wrong word slipped.

        • Belgdore@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          When you state something that is in line with the statements of terrible people it is prudent to denounce those people or otherwise say you are unaffiliated with their overall platform.

          Yes, people shouldn’t assume that you are saying more than you are, but it is still prudent to understand that people will make those assumptions. It shows self awareness.

          Normally, I would agree with you. But conservatives have been getting more fascist and have been making more calls for violence over the past decade. It’s a good idea to separate yourself from them if you don’t agree with those points.

          • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            But conservatives have been getting more fascist and have been making more calls for violence over the past decade

            how many riots were carried out by conservatives in the last 10 years?

            • Belgdore@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              The most well knows is the January 6th riot in DC. But I don’t think that’s the best metic for violence.

              How many rioters have actually killed people?

              Then how many conservative police officers have killed unarmed suspects? What about during liberal riots? How many women’s lives have been lost due to abortion bans because of conservatives? How many people have died because of lethal measures taken at the us/mexico border because of conservative policies? How many Palestinians have been killed by conservative Israeli Zionists? How many Ukrainians have been killed by conservative Russians? How many people have been killed by conservative Filipino police? How many Rohingya have died in Myanmar?

              • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                How many Palestinians have been killed by conservative Israeli Zionists? How many Ukrainians have been killed by conservative Russians? How many people have been killed by conservative Filipino police? How many Rohingya have died in Myanmar?

                No bearing at all in this conversation. We can do nothing about those in other countries. But good job deflecting the question.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      If this one action makes her a bad person, then there are no good people, which then of course would mean there are no good billionaires.

      • Dulusa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “that one action” lol

        She is basically the worst case of private jet usage and leading the list of such individuals, while somehow advocating for the environment.

        This is just ridiculous.

        And she is trying to fuck that guy up for “stalking” and “harassment”, just for showing public data.

        On top, for whatever reason, she had 2 private jets flying around until now. Seems like she sold one this month.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m don’t want to defend her use of a private her, but it seems like a ridiculous puritan test if that this makes her a bad human.

          • graymess@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            Just such an incredibly weird statement to make that Taylor Swift of all people is the threshold for finding any good in the world, and if she’s not it then no one is.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              This is not at all what I said. I said the metric used here to paint Taylor Swift as a bad person requires a level of pureness that would mean pretty much everyone is a bad person.

              I have no idea whether she is a good perspn, but I do know that “she flies in a private jet and her lawyers sued someone because they claim it is a threat to her safety… So she’s a bad person!” Is a terrible argument.

            • odelik@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think you hit the nail on the head.

              We all suck, there’s no good in humans. Maybe we should stop looking at humans, dogs might be a good place to start after all the comments I’ve heard about us not deserving them.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Where we disagree is that I don’t think all humans are bad. We all do sucky things from time to time; no one is pure. Additionally it’s often hard to see why someone might do something if you don’t share the same experiences, so it might seem evil to you.

                What I see happening here is that people want to hate her because she’s rich, and by golly anything they can latch onto to confirm that desire to be true will be trotted out.

                But we certainly agree dogs are pimp.