A potential perjury deal with a key witness could shake up the verdict in Donald Trump’s $370m New York fraud trial, a new court document reveals.

Arthur Engoron, the judge presiding over the case, sent an email to the trial’s lawyers on Monday asking them to give him more information about a supposed perjury deal that Allen Weisselberg, a former Trump Organization executive, is making with the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin Bragg.

While Bragg’s office is not involved with the fraud trial – which is being prosecuted by the state attorney general’s office – the district attorney’s office is overseeing a separate hush money case against Trump. The New York Times reported on 1 February that Bragg’s office was in the early stages of a deal with Weisselberg.

Archive

  • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Tl;DR: a key witness that was set to testify against trump in his hush money case might not testify because of a separate deal for his possible perjury

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not quiet. This is a key witness that testified in trump’s defense, and even went to jail for trump. Now, however, he’s struck a new deal in a different case to testify against trump… which isn’t great for the ongoing case where he already testified for trump.

      In other words, this is terrible news for both Trump AND Weisselberg.

      • 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Should he take the deal, Weisselberg would admit to committing perjury during his October testimony in the fraud trial. In exchange, he would not have to be a witness against Trump in the hush-money trial, which is scheduled for March.

        I will caveat that I’m not familiar with the case details at all, but my reading of that suggests that because of the deal he will not be testifying against trump, not that he will have to as part of the deal.

        • breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          He already testified in this fraud trial that’s finished but awaiting a verdict. He may be confessing to committing perjury in that testimony. That would make the already super fucked Trump even more fucked since Weisselberg testified in Trump’s defense.

          But you’re right that he won’t have to testify in a future trial.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            10 months ago

            I wonder if Team Trump is trying a strategy of sacrificing Trump’s fuckage level in certain trials to try to reduce his fuckage in others, rather than spreading his fuckedness around evenly among them all.

            • breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              IANAL, but…
              This is just a civil trial but it’s pretty high stakes. Engoran already found him guilty of fraud and revoked his business license in NY (which was stayed for now). If he rules that Trump must pay $300M, Trump will have to put up a $360M bond to appeal it or else they’ll pretty quickly start coming after his assets. And there’s no way he’ll get protected by bankruptcy for willful fraud either.

              I actually can’t remember the potential penalty for the hush money case though. Maybe they figure he’s already fucked to the max here so it couldn’t get much worse?

              • kobeathris@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                Do you get a prize if you have done so much purgury and fraud that when you admit to it, people can’t figure out if this is a good or bad thing?

                • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Yes. The prize is generally prison.

                  Edit: unless you’re rich or a politician, then it’s a toss-up.

        • geekworking@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          If he admits perjury, his credibility is gone, and nobody would want to use him in any other case regardless of any deal.