☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more @lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoGermans be likelemmy.mlimagemessage-square409fedilinkarrow-up1454
arrow-up1454imageGermans be likelemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more @lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square409fedilink
minus-squareThe Octonaut@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up35·2 years agoYou can put nuclear waste in a box and decide what to do with it later. CO² is less helpful that way.
minus-squareHestia [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 years agoAnd unlike my bills, it becomes less dangerous the longer you ignore them.
minus-squaredangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 years agoWe already have carbon storing technology. Also, you wanted subscript for the 2.
minus-squareThe Octonaut@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoI didn’t say we didn’t have carbon storing technology, but if you aren’t aware that it’s more difficult to recapture carbon than to put spent fuel in a box, you probably should read past the first paragraph of whatever Wikipedia article you found.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoNo no no, they definitely meant “carbon monoxide squared”.
You can put nuclear waste in a box and decide what to do with it later. CO² is less helpful that way.
And unlike my bills, it becomes less dangerous the longer you ignore them.
We already have carbon storing technology. Also, you wanted subscript for the 2.
I didn’t say we didn’t have carbon storing technology, but if you aren’t aware that it’s more difficult to recapture carbon than to put spent fuel in a box, you probably should read past the first paragraph of whatever Wikipedia article you found.
No no no, they definitely meant “carbon monoxide squared”.