Hey, I’m wondering what everyone’s solution is for self hosted “cloud” storage of photos? I’ve been running a PhotoPrism server on my Synology for a while but it’s missing some features I’d like to have. While we’ve set up auto-uploading from different phones to the web server, I haven’t found an easy way to share read-only access to the pictures or specific albums. There is an admin login, but no way (that I’ve found) to create multiple users with different permissions.

So SelfHosted lemmy, what’s your solve for photo storage, sorting, and sharing?

  • Qazwsxedcrfv000
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 year ago

    I have been using immich. It supports user accounts and album sharing. And recent updates on the machine learning part have made it a even more potent replacement of Google Photos imo.

  • @pound_heap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    191 year ago

    Test driving NextCloud Memories. Looks nice, works inside Nextcloud (no need to set up and maintain one more service).

    Main con so far - no mobile app

  • @CaptObvious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Have you looked at NextCloud? I have an instance running on an RPi that fits my needs (storage without sharing outside the home firewall). For anything that needs sharing, I just copy those images to an old Dropbox that I’ve kept and share from there.

    • @greatley@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Nextcloud on it’s own can’t read images EXIF data so it can’t sort them by date. I’ve tried Memories addon and it seems to work well, except for transcoding movies.

      • @CaptObvious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Good to know, thanks. I generally sort by hand if they need sorting, but using EXIF would be a nice time saver.

    • Meow.tar.gz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Nextcloud works well for general files. Immich is the way to go specifically for photo storing. It’s got a whole lot of added features.

  • @bjeanes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Immich. I recently set it up after having bounced around trying a few others, such as PhotoPrism and Synology Photos. Immich is truly excellent. I’m excited to see how it develops further!

  • OpenSourceDeezNuts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    I’ve been using Photoprism. Single-user is fine for me. I see lots of people switching to immich, but haven’t checked it out myself.

    Photoprism supports sharing albums via link to people who don’t have accounts. Mine is remotely accessible using Tailscale. I would like to set up proper remote access via DNS, but haven’t made that leap yet, I’m too nervous about opening ports up.

    • @lemming741@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I’m happy with photoprism too. I paid for the photosync plugins.

      I don’t love the free-mium model, but you can edit your docker config to unlock it I hear.

      • @czardestructo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not anymore it syncs up with their subscription server to enable features. If they don’t enable proper multi user support soon I’m going to bail.

    • @bjeanes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Photoprism supports sharing albums via link to people who don’t have accounts.

      I am definitely missing this in Immich, but otherwise happy I switched over.

  • @paradox2011@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Yeah, seems like Immich is kind if taking over. It really is an excellent one stop solution for automated multi-user backup. Ive been using it for a few months and its solid.

    The other option that I really like is a combination of software: Nextcloud + Les Pas. Nextcloud is the server where images are stored in a flat folder system, and Les Pas is an android photo album app that organizes and manages the albums. Its super nice and has some really advanced organization features. Worth checking out if you want to use nextcloud as the storage server.

  • @minishoemaze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    I’m a recent Immich adopter, but one thing that seems to be missing compared to Google photos is the ability to manually backup by picking and choosing individual photos. Am I missing something or can you only do “all or nothing” with folder backups?

  • Archy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    I recently started dumping all my photos at Immich. WIth every release it becomes greater and greater. I donated to the developer to keep it going. And I need to make a script to automate the DB backup

  • @MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Another person using Immich.

    It supports importing existing photos, so I pulled in all my old folders of stuff.

    Also has multi user with album sharing and all that.

  • @wolre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    Like many people here I’m also planning on moving to Immich. It frankly looks amazing and it has a TrueCharts version, so it should be relatively easy to deploy on TrueNAS Scale. I’m going to wait a little longer though since it’s still in relatively active development and there are quite a lot of breaking changes that I currently don’t feel like dealing with.

    • @TheCraiggers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      As somebody that already has an NFS share for their photos, is immich able to use my already existing photo location, or is it another one of those that requires an import process that copies them to its own storage?

      • @kowcop@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        There is an experimental feature where you can have a read only share (mount point) and you can run a cli and import it into Immich

      • @wolre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I guess it depends on what you’re looking for. You’ll probably be able to configure it to display your photos, but when it comes to more “advanced” features like creating albums, sharing photos with other users and the like, it’s understandably pretty difficult to find a system that would allow you to configure your own storage system.

  • ErwinLottemann
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    I sync them to out local fileserver using syncthing and recently started using immich (since it supports custom libraries now)

  • @CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Photoprism is one user only, maybe some day they wil implement multi user. You can donate to give them an incentive to work more on it. For me it is good enough.