The House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party sent a letter on Saturday to SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk demanding that U.S. troops stationed in Taiwan get access to SpaceX’s Starshield, a satellite communication network designed specifically for the military.

The letter, obtained by CNBC and first reported by Forbes, claimed that by not making Starshield available to U.S. military forces in Taiwan, SpaceX could violate its Pentagon contract, which requires “global access” to Starshield technology.

  • geekworking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why TF are we renting military stuff from any 3rd party and essentially giving them control to override the military chain of command in the first place? I can’t see this sitting well with anyone on the military side of this.

    • kerrypacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s how the whole military works. You think they spend too much now…try socialising it all.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Outsourcing is the new thing, you don’t have to take the blame and that’s value for a lot of decision makers.

      Also it always, ALWAYS results in a shittier product. Which is part of the reason why the world is fucked right now.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    9 months ago

    “We demand that you make us reliant on you for communications!”

    JFC we spend a trillion bucks a year on the military. Why don’t they have their own satellite internet already?

    • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They do, it just not as fast or reliable. SpaceX put more into infrastructure whereas the Military just did bare minimum. Now that Starlink is so much better, it’s cheaper and more efficient to rent from them than to continue building their own.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          They’d have to seize spaceX too, which is the reason that starlink is viable in the first place due to reduced costs in launching satellites.

          And then if they do both, survive the brain drain while simultaneously surviving the onslaught of Republican attempts to defund it into oblivion, because that’s what they do.

          Yeah. I don’t like those chances, nor do I like Musk essentially having power over foreign relations. Kinda lose lose, which is why we’re in this shitty holding pattern atm.

        • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You know what would be the cherry on top? Seize all of Musk’s assets, and kick his ass out of the country. Along with the Murdochs.

        • Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you really want to give the government the power to do that, and then hand that power over to the military… I don’t like Musk but I see so many worse scenarios with this being controlled by the military.

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              This is crazy talk. Anybody can smuggle some terminals into their country. That doesn’t mean they’re being “helped”. The US government would come down on SpaceX with unprecedented force if they violated sanctions like that

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                It’s crazy talk? No. It’s reality. Elon shut down Starlink for the Ukraine military with the excuse that they would have started World War 3. Meaning he has the power to shut down Starlink for the Russians as well.

                • cole@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I’d love to better understand your position. it seems like you think that Starlink is aware of who is using a terminal. how can Starlink differentiate between a Ukrainian and Russian user in the same general area? should Starlink randomly turn off user terminals it suspects? what if it accidentally turns off a Ukrainian one? billing is obv not a good indicator

                  I want to understand your thoughts a little more clearly on this

                • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  They didn’t have it on in that area and refused to turn it on when asked. They didn’t just shut down the sats.

          • TheChurn@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            The government already has the power to do that.

            If shit ever hit the fan, they could just invoke the DPA and force starlink to do exactly what they say.

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          that seems pretty stupid, should we also seize Amazon Kuiper when they start launching very soon?

        • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You can’t really put a real cost on seizing something like that. Not all of the costs will be up front or even obvious. People don’t like having their stit stolen, oddly enough.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Elon says no because he doesn’t want to start a nuclear war. Which is why he will provide unlimited Starshield access to China.

  • lntl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    lol, at least they’re asking nicely. they can “collectivize” the equipment if they decide it’s necessary