Was just talking at dinner with family, and it seems a logical action to ban circumcision, as in most cases, doesn’t have consent, and is a major (genitals are important) body modification. Can we ban it at the state level? Just a thought.

  • then_three_more@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve never understood the American obsession with MGM (male genital mutilation). But it seems that a large percentage of your population has had it done. So from an outsider perspective it seems like it must be a cultural thing to your country. So for laws to exist that ban it (or at least make it harder to authorise) you’d first need a cultural shift, then. Enough political will for laws to be passed.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 months ago

      It really isn’t cultural. In the early 1900s, William Kellogg (of Kellogg’s) was a puritanical Christian. He hated the idea of masturbation more than anything, so he created Corn Flakes to be a cereal so bland it would kill your libido and prevent you from masturbating. He also was a proponent of circumcision as a means of preventing masturbation because it would make the penis too tight that stroking it would be painful. Americans bought into his propaganda that circumcised penises are “cleaner” and then it just became “well, I’m circumcised, and my son’s penis should look like mine!”

      No one said that the average American was intelligent.

      • then_three_more@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sounds pretty cultural to me, something that’s persisted for a hundred and twenty years (What’s that a quarter of your country’s history?) based on an over religious ideal and pushed by a capitalist.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I consider “culture” to have a deeper meaning to a population, at least moreso than “my dick’s cut, so my kid’s gonna have a cut dick because I’m not aware of basic hygiene practices!”

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            “my dick’s cut, so my kid’s gonna have a cut dick

            Change the sex and genitalia in question, and this is basically what drives FGM. It’s mostly women who had it done to them that drive the practice forward. That’s how traditional practices work in general - you repeating what happened to you with your offspring, often long past the point where the original purpose (if any) has any value.

      • morphballganon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        He also was a proponent of circumcision as a means of preventing masturbation because it would make the penis too tight that stroking it would be painful

        … well, I for one am very glad he was mistaken in this point.