In case it’s not painfully obvious, this is a parody account.

  • kadu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    3 年前

    Just yesterday I was about to eat an orange from the supermarket, but then someone told me these contain (2R)-2-[(1S)-1,2-dihydroxyethyl]-3,4-dihydroxy-2H-furan-5-one. I mean seriously, I can’t even pronounce this - the question is who benefits from adding these chemicals to our fruits? The government?

    Luckily for me though, I replaced oranges with a healthy dose of Cheerios™ and I’m feeling very healthy and refreshed.

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 年前

      Chemist here, no clue what this was at first glance. Hell’s bells IUPAC names for organic molecules are ugly. It’s ascorbic acid.

      • kadu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 年前

        That’s why we biologists don’t ever touch IUPAC names.

        Does it come from an orange? Great, now it’s called orangy acid. Works fine for us.

        What’s that? Sugar from a fruit? Fructose. Don’t bother us.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 年前

        Chemical engineer here, I remember when learning orgo that I thought the IUPAC names were hot shit and so formal and cool.

        As I got older and got exposure to industry it was a hard left turn. What do you mean “ethylene” is a better name for the olefin of ethane, vs ethene for the alkene? I mean seriously what kind of distinction is that?

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 年前

      Absolutely outrageous, they also contain vitamins, and did you know vitamins are chemicals!!! Better to avoid that shit. With artificial flavor and color you get way fewer chemicals.