• JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t agree with it, but I get it.

    We had a very limited supply of masks in the country. Remember, we had people volunteering to stitch cloth masks or 3D printed “straps” for face shields…to donate to doctors and nurses who couldn’t get enough masks to stay safe. Breweries and distilleries were re-tooling to make hand sanitizer.

    Meanwhile we were already at the start of the supply chain itself collapsing.

    We were at a point where Trump was hijacking intercepting shipments of masks to scalp redistribute them to the highest bidder hospitals that needed them more.

    Now, if they had said that day “everyone needs to wear a mask in public”, that would have completely toppled the supply for hospitals, and I’d say it’s significantly more critical for frontline workers to have them than people who were able to hunker down and wait until Easter when the whole thing blows over (womp womp).

    You know that any other messaging would’ve caused a rush on face masks and frontline workers, and probably made the whole thing worse.

    In retrospect it’s easy to say that they should have been transparent about the messaging. But in retrospect, we also know that most people are selfish assholes.

    • Patches@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You don’t get to play the Prisoners Dilemma, publicly betray the other as your opening gambit, and then foam at the mouth that everyone is refusing to cooperate for the next 3 years.

      There is no point in arguing this.

      You can believe the ends justify the means however you want.

      I watched people very-close-to-me die from COVID in front of me as an essential worker. I was told a mask would not save my life. I was a pig for the slaughter.

      Science can be infallible. People aren’t. I will never trust the CDC again.