null

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    no, sometimes people suck and deserve to have their sentiment downvoted - at least on a site where voting has to exist

    on proper forums where there is no voting, there are better ways to discourage behavior, like just ignoring the user / posts. but if the buttons are there you want to click them

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Slashdot still has the best moderation system. I never understood why it didn’t become the norm. You get x number of mod points per week/month. X is determined by how active you are on the platform. You use those points to up/down vote stuff. And there’s a dropdown list of reasons for each. Having a limited number of points means people use them only when appropriate. And the list of reasons insures the points aren’t just used as Likes or Disagree.

  • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely not. It is misleading like on YouTube. Before they removed downvotes everyone could see if a video is useful or not. “Best tips and tricks for car repair” … 15341 upvotes? Nice! Maybe it’s helpfu–… 98412 downvotes? Maybe not THAT helpful.

    • _number8_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s so nice being able to see actual downvote count again instead of total score as well. glad lemmy has no motivation to remove that at the moment [what was reddit’s reason? spam prevention? not worth it]

  • luis@kleptonix.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I personally feel like restricting downvotes is cutting off a vital voice that people may have so that’s why in my instance I have them enabled. If there’s something that the community disagrees with I feel like the community should be able to vote on that rather than only allowing upvotes and not allowing everyone to voice their proper opinion on something.

  • notexecutive@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Downvotes can help drive engagement as more people try to understand what was said.

    People being downvoted doesnt necessarily mean it is hateful, it could just be incorrect or morally objectionable… it’s important that discourse is there, too.

    • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      But that’s the thing innit, it’s supposed to be a visibility vote, not an “I agree/disagree” vote, but people keep using it as that. Maybe we need more buttons.

      • TWeaK@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even as a visibility vote it’s somewhat flawed. If you downvote everything that’s wrong, then many people will miss out on corrections to commonly held misconceptions.

  • iorale@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think downvotes are ok as long as they show the real ammounts along the upvotes, besides there’s no karma here.
    Also for those that say people could abuse downvotes to bury discussion, well guess what? People abuse upvotes too to increase their visibility, then we should disable upvotes so they can’t be abused either, right?

    I think it’s ok if an instance decides to disable them (or both) if they don’t want or can’t deal with being downvoted, but trying to spread it to other instances is just trying to create a circlejerk.

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No. Downvotes aren’t nothing more than gauge of the specific place climate anyway. Disabling them always looks for me like cheap try of enforcing positivity and openness in places where there is problem with it. Downvotes also help people find their own interests communities.

  • Generator@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    If there’s an election but you only able to vote on one party, is it a democracy?
    That’s how digg.com ended, removed mods and downvotes, and users left.

    I can post something that I think it’s funny or interesting, but other don’t, it’s their opinion to vote what it’s of their interest

  • Whooping_Seal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel that downvotes / dislikes don’t contribute in large forum-style communities. The “proper” use of them is very useful, but the “improper” usage of downvotes becomes rampant on larger communities, rather than people expressing “this doesn’t contribute” with downvotes they end up using them to express “I don’t like you and/or your opinion” which results in high-quality posts and comments getting downvoted into oblivion because they do not conform to what the majority deems correct.

    This also can be exasperated in communities that are more taste-based, e.g. a community discussing music rather than a community dealing with more objective knowledge.

    I guess this is a really long way of saying that I agree with them disabling them but I do not think “mental health” is the concern, more so that they cannot fulfill their intended purpose in larger communities or taste-based communities.

  • CrimeDad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know about the mental health aspect, but I know that up/down-voting can be abused. Getting rid of down-voting doesn’t really fix anything. For me, on lemmy.one, which also has down-voting disabled, it just kind of makes me feel like I’m supposed to up-vote everything I don’t dislike. So it seems like disabling down-voting just breaks an otherwise useful metric. I think an actual solution might involve weighing up and down votes according to a karma-like score of whoever is voting. This way, it will be very inefficient if a bunch of fake or bad accounts try to harass someone with lots of down-voting or try to promote a bad post with lots of up-voting.

  • autumn@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Disabling downvotes in brigade-prone or support communities makes sense, but I wish more instances had downvotes enabled. Sometimes I see posts giving incorrect information or just incredibly bad takes that don’t necessarily reach the level where mod intervention is required.

  • king_dead@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not a fan personally, I’ve never really cared about old Reddit cliches like “the hivemind” or “downvotes = disagreement”. I just really liked being able to tell bad content to fuck off without getting into a flame war. Beehaw’s moderation against hate speech is why I’m still with it despite the no downvote settings

  • grean@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like that profile view in lemmy does not show the total “score”. So when someone downvotes your comment, they downvote just that, the comment, not you. Which I think is good for mental health.

    Speaking for myself, I feel that possibility of getting downvotes makes me more careful to not invoke negative emotions in others and instead keep more positive tone. In the long run that may be good for everyone’s mental health as well!