• neptune@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    Probably none. The whole bathroom debate has been legally dubious from the outset.

    • harderian729@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s weird. They can refuse people using their bathrooms if they don’t pay, I figured denying them for other reasons was also on the table.

        • harderian729@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, they shouldn’t even have to check birth certificates.

          What’s stopping a business from saying you can’t use their restrooms just because they feel like it?

          • Djtecha@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            Might be part of the requirement for running a business is you have to have a restroom available. When’s the last time you were in a restaurant without a bathroom? I’m sure they all don’t just supply one because it’d be weird to not, instead it’s probably part of the license req.

          • neptune@dmv.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Well potentially nothing? Until someone says “why?” and then it becomes gender discrimination

          • quindraco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            In the general case, nothing. Not too long ago I was in a Ben & Jerry’s that had closed its bathroom down, for example.

            The bartender in question here committed battery; that’s the underlying crime, not denying bathroom access. The hate crime rider on top is, by definition, an enhanced penalty for thinking illegal thoughts while committing some other crime.