• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    The idea that money is tied to the state is silly.

    No, it’s not. It’s historically accurate. All money is state money, always has been, always will be.

    Many things have been used as money, way before the concept of a “state” existed.

    Nope. Sorry, that’s wrong.

    Undeniably the money that lasted best across the passage of time is gold.

    Gold isn’t money. Gold is a commodity. Gold was used for jewelry, and as a bright shiny thing that didn’t tarnish had value because of that. People would sometimes exchange gold or things made of gold, but not gold coins. But, they’d also exchange other useful things: food, tools, cloth, etc. Gold coins were created by various states.

    people willing to exchange it for goods and services

    Never happened. Sure, there were gifts or donations, but it wasn’t X amount of gold for Y amount of grain. There were debts, but debts weren’t listed as a certain amount of gold, or a certain amount of money. Debts are old, money is new. Trading one thing for a certain “price” didn’t happen until coins existed, and coins didn’t exist until there was a state.

    Todays fiat money is created at will by a few select people that are not democratically elected

    Oh, blah blah blah. “Fiat money” is the only kind of money that has ever existed or will ever exist. It doesn’t much matter whether the government is “democratically elected” or not, currencies are created by and backed by a state and their ability to obtain a monopoly on the use of force within their area of influence. Most states with currencies are currently democratic, even if the structure of the US federal reserve is confusing to you.

    They get to decide how much they debase your savings for the “greater good”, while the ones that profit the most are those who control the source.

    More blah blah blah crypto nonsense.

    Look, do some research on this stuff. Debt is a good place to start.

    • itsmect@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      people willing to exchange it for goods and services Never happened.

      This is literally what you do every day. You exchange something for goods and services. This something is money based on it’s functional role, not some obscure definitions. To be money, it must be used as money. To be used as money, a group of people must agree that the item is worth exchanging for. This something does need to fulfill additional properties to be useful, notably it must be fungible, durable, portable, recognizable, divisible and have a stable supply. Gold does fit this description, but so does fiat.

      What you are describing is a government issued currency, which has some overlap with money, but is not the same thing. Maybe you should research on this stuff.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is literally what you do every day. You exchange something for goods and services

        Yes, now that there’s money it’s what happens. Prior to money there were debts, but no exchange of “X” for a set amount of goods or services.

        To be money, it must be used as money.

        To be money it must meet all the definitions of money. It must be a store of value, it must be a unit of account and a medium of exchange. There was no real money until there were states.

        What you are describing is a government issued currency

        Government issued currencies are the only real currencies. Everything else is valued by what someone will pay for it in government issued currency.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Gold being a commodity because its shiny and therefore has value is no different than “I want to use this coin to better protect my data and privacy”. Both are values attributed to a commodity. Also, “It may have intrinsic value (commodity money), or be legally exchangeable for something with intrinsic value (representative money), or only have nominal value (fiat money).”

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_money

      You are wrong that money has always existed as state issued. That isn’t true

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Gold being a commodity because its shiny and therefore has value is no different than “I want to use this coin to better protect my data and privacy”.

        It’s completely different. Gold is a commodity because it is inherently useful in itself. If someone invented a way to create gold out of thin air, people would continue to want gold because it’s pretty and shiny, and because it’s a very good electrical conductor that doesn’t tarnish. Crypto coins are only useful because everyone thinks that a greater fool will come along and pay as much or more. Everyone knows they have no inherent value, but so far there has always been a greater fool.

        You are wrong that money has always existed as state issued. That isn’t true

        Sure it is.

        • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Hey by the way, after we had that discussion bitcoin surpassed silver to become the 8th most valuable asset by market cap on the entire planet More than coca cola and Pepsi combined.

          Also no, money has existed outside of States and Countries before you should look into the Theory of Money and the history behind it

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s not an asset. A bubble doesn’t prove anything. Tulips were once as valuable as houses… until they weren’t.

            The theory of money is a theory. The fact is that money has always been associated with a state.