• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Can’t really do that,

      The US government isn’t party to private contracts. Can’t dictate terms in that manner.

      Unless you literally want to socialize all economic activities everywhere.

      • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, they actually can. That’s a completely facetious argument. Laws can set standards without defining everything. It’s done all the time.

      • yarr@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        The US government isn’t party to private contracts. Can’t dictate terms in that manner.

        Nonsense. Try writing a contract that makes someone your slave and see how enforceable it is. How do you think minimum wage works? Walmart is paying that out of the goodness of their heart? No… they are forced to by the feds.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The US government isn’t party to private contracts

        Learn what at-will employment is and how much of the US is stuck with it

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m fully aware of at will employment.

          I fail to see how that helps with the 32 workweek. You’re not going to get a general strike, and there’s plenty of people who will happily move into that job.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            If you’re fully aware of what at-will is then you’d know saying

            The US government isn’t party to private contracts

            Is silly when the overwhelming majority of employees in this country do not have a private contract for employment

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yes they do.

              A contract is simply an agreement- in the case of employment, to provide work for payment. Even at will, that is a contract. The contract can be terminated any time at will by either party, but it’s still a contract.