Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said policy differences toward Israel between her and President Biden won’t stop her from supporting him in the November general election.

“Of course,” Omar said Tuesday, when asked by CNN’s Abby Phillip on “NewsNight” whether she would vote for Biden if the election were held that day, in a clip highlighted by Mediaite. “Democracy is on the line, we are facing down fascism.”

“And I personally know what my life felt like having Trump as the president of this country, and I know what it felt like for my constituents, and for people around this country and around the world,” Omar continued. “We have to do everything that we can to make sure that does not happen to our country again.”

  • blazeknave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    9 months ago

    Thanks. I feel like there’s only a few of us even calling this out anymore. It’s made me tired and really hating Lemmy.

      • Hypx@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s a lot of tankies on Lemmy/Fediverse. They present a misleading picture of what people really think.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          I would agree with you, had I not just had a conversation with a friend about a discord they’re in being infected with the “U.S. is a totalitarian state” tankie bullshit.

          Indoctrination works both ways, it isn’t just conservatives.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Nah, these people are just garden variety idiots. My friend was roommates with one, dumbfuck wasted a ton of his tuition money on drugs and all of a sudden he’s communist.

              Edit: downvotes huh? Sounds like we’ve got some people who spent their money unwisely here. Adds up.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          Not funding a genocide is a tanky thing?

          Lmao. The word had officially lost all meaning.

          • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            Well, considering Russia wants to stamp out Ukraine’s cultural identity and has kidnapped children and killed civilians en masse, and tankies don’t want to fund Ukraine’s defense and make excuses for Russia…

            Tankies don’t exactly have a high ground with genocide. They’re against funding a genocide, and apparently also against funding a defense against a genocide.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I don’t give a fuck about them. I care about you guys trying to lump the entire anti war, anti war crimes group into being tankies.

              • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                I don’t lump those people into the Tankies group unless their idea of anti war is to give to the aggressor everything they want. At some point war becomes necessary if the aggressor refuses to see anything else.

                  • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Tankie seems to be a term that means very different things to various people. I see it as someone, typically a leftist, who makes excuses for an authoritarian government opposed to the US. In this sense, the people who disparage Palestinian protesters are actually closer to Tankie than the protesters. They make excuses for the genocidal actions of a country they like.

                    I suppose that would be my definition of it. Someone who makes excuses for the genocidal actions of a country they like, for whatever reason. Typically applies to leftists but not always.

    • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I met with a few that tries to argue that the correct choice is to vote for third party. And, other people called them out on it.

      I’m far-left as you come, but, I still vote for the feasible and better option in the general. I always vote for the better in the primary without exception. I voted for Bernie in 2020 primary even if Biden is guaranteed to have the nomination, and voted for Biden.

      And my opinion is that Biden is the better of the two in context of Israel. He at least sanctioned settlers, and some days that will include Jenin(?) settlers. Trump won’t do that. And most people that are against Israel has less to do with war at Gaza than settlers and the clowns in Israel government.

      • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        9 months ago

        The “I’m voting third party because I don’t like either candidate” people are the reason for Trump’s first presidency

        • Albatross2724@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          So… no, that’s not even remotely true. The percentage of third party votes would not have helped Hillary win the 2016 election. She ran a terrible campaign and completely ignored the key states: Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. All 3 states, at least at the time, were considered heavily blue states, and she proceeded to lose in all 3. Her campaign lacked a clear, articulated message that spoke to voters to draw out a significant voter turnout, and just underestimated the populism aspect of Trump’s run. He was full of shit and his legacy will be the conservative supreme court justices he left behind, but his campaign promised to revitalize dying blue class industries in the Rust belt which incentivized working class voters in a way that Hillary’s moderate campaign absolutely failed to.

          I don’t think the populism factor will attract new voters for this upcoming election, as both Trump and Biden have their core voter bases established. However, the campaign messaging that gives voters incentive for a better turnout will always be the key factor. The message of “Hey, at least I’m not the other guy” does not work. It didn’t work in 2016. Hillary didn’t even learn from her failed campaign because in the aftermath of her defeat she wrote in her book What Happened, “If just 40,000 people across Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania had changed their minds, I would have won”. That whole mindset is just so out of touch with the political landscape in 2016, and this upcoming election cycle will be no different.

          • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            The third party voters in a handful of states absolutely ended up being the deciding factor. It’s not the absolute number of electoral college votes which I think you know but instead the states like Wisconsin and Michigan that Trump won by less than the larger than typical number of green party votes. I don’t think that this trick will work twice but it’s certainly being astroturfed like crazy again

            • Albatross2724@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              77 votes in the electoral college. The total electoral college votes for third parties combined (Gary Johnson + Jill Stein) was 7. So in the unlikely event that Hillary won over all of the Gary Johnson libertarian voters and Jill Stein green party voters, she would still have lost. By a lot. She won the popular vote so that’s cool. But unfortunately that doesn’t win elections.

              • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                She won the popular vote so that’s cool. But unfortunately that doesn’t win elections.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s such a practical topic for the election, too, right? Never mind the shit the Republicans are pulling on a day to day basis- that shit has already been normalized.

        • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          You sure do not have any idea who I voted for beyond Bernie. I always look up candidates and pick the ones with better access to healthcare, education, working environment, etc.

          • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            leftists are building a revolution to overthrow capitalism.

            if all you’re doing is voting, and for Democrats, then you are not, in fact, a leftist.

            • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Fucking lulz.

              Leftists don’t actually have to be against capitalism as a concept. Some of us do support european-esque capitalism because of easier access to healthcare and education.

              And that’s the bare minimum, but the most impactful, and the most realistic. You, the 3rd party voter, can’t even cite when they have ever made a dent in the nation-wide scale, and you very well know that you can’t convince educated leftists to split their vote to give it to Trump. But, do try, and I’ll be laughing at the attempts.

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                >you very well know that you can’t convince educated leftists to split their vote to give it to Trump

                leftists certainly wouldn’t give their vote to trump

                • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yeah, if they were leftists, they vote left on downballot and vote for realistic options that is closest to left on general. That means, third parties are out unless ranked choice is a thing.

                  • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    >That means, third parties are out unless ranked choice is a thing.

                    why would a leftist vote for a conservative politician? they wouldn’t

                • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Note that capitalism is everywhere, and politicians that do not want to change their economic system to socialism are still counted to left for strong support toward welfare, healthcare, etc. Heavily regulated capitalism is left to the center. Do you have an argument against this?

              • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 months ago

                >You, the 3rd party voter, can’t even cite when they have ever made a dent in the nation-wide voter

                you never asked, and, frankly, there is a cure for historical illiteracy, too

                • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Sure, try arguing when was the last time third party has made a dent, and by what percentage. Cure my supposed historical illiteracy please.