“There’s this wild disconnect between what people are experiencing and what economists are experiencing,” says Nikki Cimino, a recruiter in Denver.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You didn’t finish reading the end of the single sentence in my comment.

      the improvements in technology that make elder care less expensive.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There is a possibility of that being happening but the last half-century of economic trends makes this unlikely, unfortunately. This decade, especially, makes it likely that the gouging will continue and any advances making care less expensive will just see an increase in profits at the top. Every industry seems to have give into overdrive on driving up profits at the populace’s expense, with the exception of basic consumer entertainment electronics but, they are, realistically also driving up effective costs as they are being used to harvest customer data for sale.

        If we’re getting out of this, we’re going to have to do it ourselves because none of the established holders of power have shown the slightest inkling of being interested in stopping it.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The last half-century of economic trends supports my expectations, actually. Treatments have been getting cheaper as technology advances. New treatments tend to be expensive, yes. But then as they become older they too get cheaper.

          • ShieldGengar@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Insulin was discovered over 100 years ago and it took policy, not improvements in manufacturing, to lower the price (which only happened last year).

            In America, they don’t get cheaper because it got easier to make.

            • FaceDeer@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              That’s not true. Originally insulin had to be isolated from animal pancreases, a costly procedure. The first handful of humans to be treated with it were literally the children of wealthy politicians, a congressman and the secretary of state. They were the only ones who could get access to it. It’s now produced in industrial quantities using recombinant bacteria to synthesize it. It’s routine.

              I’m speaking about large-scale trends here. Obviously the prices of things have their localized ups and downs when you look at them on the scale of a few years. But I’m not expecting to need elder care for quite a few decades yet.

                • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yes, again, I’m talking about large-scale trends, not the current spot prices. I don’t live in the United States anyway, most people don’t. Note how cheap it is everywhere else?