• SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Israel creates racist apartheid laws and illegally starved Gazans in a blockade and you’re mad that people nonviolently broke some of those laws in an attempt to demand their human rights?

    Human rights violations and unjust imprisonment of an entire population are not something anyone should be expected to just “obey.” Next you’ll be telling me Jews were breaking laws when they tried to escape the Warsaw ghetto.

    • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      First of all, Israel left Gaza in 2005. They no longer govern it. In addition, they have been allowing huge amounts of cash flowing into the region and they are even unable to impose a full blockade considering the border with Egypt. If Palestinians are so peace-loving individuals, why the relations with Egpyt are far from ideal, too? Hence why it is mostly Hamas responsible for the situation in Gaza.

      So yes, a response is fully excepted if members of a different state (that by the way wants to exterminate Israel) illegally cross the border.

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        No. Israel pulled its settlements out of Gaza but they land and sea blockaded it since 2007 and turned it into an open air prison and kept bombing it. Israel controls all the borders, including the Egypt crossings due to their treaty with Egypt that allows them veto power over who can cross from Egypt.

        Egypt is a dictatorship that mistreats minorities, if you want to compare Israel favorably to them then be my guest.

        • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It literally cannot control the Egypt border considering the fact they are not in. If Gaza had normal relationship with Egypt, maybe we could start believing Israel is the problem here but if none of Gaza’s neighbors/any other Muslim countries are willing to take Gazans in, the problem must be somewhere else than in Israel.

          Edit: Before 7th of October, there were more people of Gaza coming to Israel on daily bases rather than to Egypt. Why are we blaming israel of “occupation” and not Egypt?

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        First of all, Israel left Gaza in 2005. They no longer govern it.

        This is such a pathetic excuse, not to mention just a parrot point of pro-Zionist racists.

        So they left Gaza, and yet they control every fucking thing that goes in and out?? Looks like they just left so they can keep making this pathetic point while still cutting off water and electricity whenever they feel like it.

        Get that head out of that ass please.

        • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          If Israel controls the import so much, how come they have so many weapons and so much money?

          If they were as locked as you say, they would not be able to create such an attack.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Dude, smuggling.

            If Israel didn’t control so much, it would not have been able to block aid and water and electricity and internet with ease.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Because that state is the one at war with them… they stole their lands, displaced them, and bombed them every few years for resisting colonialism and invasion.

                You would not find it acceptable to live under thr rule of an occupier, so why should I as a Palestinian?

                • theotherverion@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t know how organizing terrorist attacks from time to time and then refusing 2 state solution can be considered a resistance. EDIT: To me it seems like they chose the all or nothing route.

                  Also, it is still counter productive for Palestinians to attack israel when they are reliant of them.

                  • ???@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I don’t know how being an apartheid state all the time for 75+ years then refusing a two state solution can be considered a democratic legal state…

                    You make it sound like Palestinians are dogs fed by Israelis… if you colonize a nation, you are obliged to provide for them. If Israel doesn’t want Gazans to be “reliant” on their “generous donations” of food and water, they should not have sieged them and abused them day in and day out.