Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college’s Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse’s presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

  • aidan@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah what your saying is he is not famous for his speaking skills, which are normal person levels. So I don’t see why this is surprising

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Do you consistently defend people that you admit are unqualified for their job and incapable of doing it - even when it’s as essential as bragging about crossing state lines to procure a gun and manufacture a flimsy legal pretext to kill your political opponents, or is this an outlier for you?

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Everyone does that - unlike you, most people are also capable of progressing to conclusions from straightforward situations or answering simple questions.

              This has strong neo-Nazi-style “just asking questions” energy. If you’re capable of drawing conclusions, own them. If you’re not, you’ve got nothing to contribute here.

              • aidan@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                from straightforward situations or answering simple questions.

                Do you mean baseless assumptions?

                This has strong neo-Nazi-style “just asking questions” energy. If you’re capable of drawing conclusions, own them.

                This is your reaction to me saying it’s not surprising that a young adult is awkward and doesn’t handle unexpected confrontation well.

                • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Edit: Most of this is way off topic in response to an entirely different dipshit.


                  Do you mean baseless assumptions?

                  No - I mean obvious conclusions - you know, like seeing HD footage of the IDF drone striking obvious unarmed civilians and concluding they’re drone striking obvious unarmed civilians. Never mind the rhetoric of their government or the IDF, or the track record of either. Baseless is pretending it’s plausible they’re Hamas.

                  This is your reaction to me saying it’s not surprising that a young adult is awkward and doesn’t handle unexpected confrontation well.

                  Nope - this is in response to you seeing clear, entirely unambiguous evidence of warcrimes and saying we can’t possibly know what’s happening. I know how old I am, and some genocide denying dipshit telling me otherwise isn’t going to change that.

                  Just to drive the point home, I’ll ask the question we know you can’t answer one final time - where’s your evidence these civilians are Hamas?