return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agoBiden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: 'They have a point'www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square490fedilinkarrow-up1594
arrow-up1594external-linkBiden reacts to pro-Palestinian protesters: 'They have a point'www.nbcnews.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square490fedilink
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoI’m fine with that; just make sure you go to the other user in the thread and say the same thing. Did you do that? Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”? Curiously you did not.
minus-squareSybil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years ago Did you do that? Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”? Curiously you did not. i asked you to be the bigger person.
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoDouble-standard. Ask both. Go on… It “takes two to tango,” after all.
minus-squareSybil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoyou’ll forgive me if this reads as though you are not only acting in bad faith, but know you are, and plan to continue.
minus-squareSybil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agodo you think they would be more willing than you to stop engaging dishonestly?
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoWho’s engaging dishonestly? Citation needed. That has yet to be substantively evinced.
minus-squareSybil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 years agoyou admitted that you were using fallacious rhetoric already (thouh your admission is not necessary: it was prima facie). but you also (correctly) pointed out a strawman, which is also fallacious rhetoric.
I’m fine with that; just make sure you go to the other user in the thread and say the same thing.
Did you do that?
Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”?
Curiously you did not.
i asked you to be the bigger person.
Double-standard.
Ask both. Go on… It “takes two to tango,” after all.
you’ll forgive me if this reads as though you are not only acting in bad faith, but know you are, and plan to continue.
do you think they would be more willing than you to stop engaging dishonestly?
Who’s engaging dishonestly? Citation needed. That has yet to be substantively evinced.
you admitted that you were using fallacious rhetoric already (thouh your admission is not necessary: it was prima facie). but you also (correctly) pointed out a strawman, which is also fallacious rhetoric.