• Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Okay except most rifles, including AK47’s AR15’s and M16’s are semi automatic only so they aren’t selective fire. And if we ignore that requirement and go with the the other two requirements it means that .22lr hunting rifles with a box mag count as “assault rifles”

    Pistols are still the deadliest type of guns no matter what metric you use.

    The head of the ATF is also responsible for operation fast and furious. Not to mention that is a nothing statement when you think about it. Of course they start off as legal firearms. Gun traffickers are “legally” buying these weapons overseas end mass from firearm companies and warlords or they’re being stolen from legal gun owners.

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Honestly true. I just think he’s a moron so I discount much of what he says.

        Also I looked up the statement about most guns being legal. Based on data from his own agency its 54%. While that is technically the majority, thats a coin flip. “Virtually all” in my books is 70% or higher.

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Pistols are still the deadliest type of guns no matter what metric you use.

      That’s a silly statement. Why do you think soldiers prefer to use assault rifles in combat? I said “deadliest” meaning the most capable of killing, not the most statistically likely gun to kill someone.

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        “Most capable of killing” doesn’t mean anything though. A bullet is a bullet is a bullet. What gun its fired out of doesn’t really matter when its against soft targets. 9mm 5.56 and 7.62 are all the same lethality.

        Edit: Also comparing the use case of gangers and even school shooters with soldiers is foolish. The main benefits of a rifle (in war) are range, stability and higher cyclic rate. Virtually all rifles are semi automatic so cyclic rate doesn’t matter. And at the range pretty much all school shootings take place in, pistol vs rifle doesn’t matter. Stability is also largely irrelevant based on distance and the fact that unarmed civilians dont shoot back.

        All this to say, 91% of school shootings are perpetrated with pistols. So this hyperfixation on “assault rifles” is silly. I say again, you’ve been lied to.

        • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ok I don’t really agree with all of your lines of reasoning but I’m curious what you think the solution to our gun problem is. We at least agree that we have a problem, right?