twotone@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-23年前Which is your preferred smartwatch/fitness tracker?www.tomsguide.comexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1123file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1123external-linkWhich is your preferred smartwatch/fitness tracker?www.tomsguide.comtwotone@beehaw.org to Technology@beehaw.org · edit-23年前message-square92fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareowf@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-23年前They were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed. Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats. It’s incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.
minus-squarejabib (he/him)@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3年前Seems like your post was incredibly low effort, as the Vivoactive (all the way back to the blocky original) supported speed fields. https://averagejoecyclist.com/how-to-use-garmin-vivoactive-3-record-bike-ride/
They were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed.
Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats.
It’s incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.
Seems like your post was incredibly low effort, as the Vivoactive (all the way back to the blocky original) supported speed fields.
https://averagejoecyclist.com/how-to-use-garmin-vivoactive-3-record-bike-ride/