• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You mention 60% minimum, the second there’s a minimum then you can’t hire employees living far from an office or if you do you create two classes of employees.

    Why should I RTO 60% of the time if they are ready to let others with the same job RTO 0% if the time? Just because I got unlucky and they happen to have an office less than X km away from where I live? How come I’m not allowed to move somewhere further away and get the same exemption then?

    We call that discrimination and I’m not even getting into how it impacts women and POC more than white guys to have to RTO.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Re-read that post. They didn’t say 60% of the time they said office capacity should be 60% of the workforce at minimum.

      You can make more coherent arguments arguing the actual words the other guy said.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Last time im going to comment at this, This will have no use to explain to you but hey, im going to try anyway.
        No, the minimum is not set to force people to go the office. Its so people like myself, who work better in an office, to have a spot when needed. You are reading what you want, not what im saying.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fuckin hell guy. Can NO ONE in this thread read? Go back and reread my post, I’m literally clarifying that exact thing to the other dude.

          Tf is with reading comprehension??