cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/10503609

Alex Garland is expected to write the scripts for all three of the 28 Years Later movies, but apparently didn’t want to direct them. Danny Boyle will only be directing the first one. For the second film, possibly titled 28 Years Later Part 2, he’ll be passing the helm over to Candyman and The Marvels director Nia DaCosta. Production on DaCosta’s sequel will begin immediately after Boyle wraps filming on his. They wanted to have the sequel director signed on before filming on the first movie begins, as they want to “make sure each director is on the same page in regard to the story while also having time to bring their own vision to life.”

While doing the press rounds for Oppenheimer last year, Murphy told Collider, “I was talking to Danny Boyle recently, and I said, ‘Danny, we shot the movie at the end of 2000.’ So I think we’re definitely approaching the 28 Years Later. But like I’ve always said, I’m up for it. I’d love to do it. If Alex [Garland] thinks there’s a script in it and Danny wants to do it, I’d love to do it.“ Despite the fact that Murphy is willing to reprise the role of Jim and is on board 28 Years Later as an executive producer, we still haven’t heard confirmation that he’ll actually be in the movie. While talking to Josh Horowitz on the Happy Sad Confused podcast a couple months ago, Murphy said (with thanks to Coming Soon for the transcription), “It’s for (Danny Boyle and Alex Garland) to speak about, I suppose, but I think it’s been brewing for a while. The first movie was so important for me, as an actor. I love working with those guys. Alex has an idea. And Danny directing is just huge. Watch this space.”

While we wait to hear for sure if Cillian Murphy is or isn’t in the movie, other casting rumors have been floating around. According to industry scooper Daniel Richtman, Jodie Comer (Killing Eve) and Charlie Hunnam (Sons of Anarchy) are in talks to play the lead roles. Details on the characters they might be playing are, of course, being kept under wraps.

There was a bidding war over the distribution rights to the 28 Years Later trilogy, with Warner Bros. and Sony emerging as the final competitors – and Sony taking the win in the end. According to The Hollywood Reporter, “Each movie will have a budget in the $60 million range but it’s unclear how goalposts or compensation may have changed during the high-stakes negotiations. A theatrical release was of great import to the filmmakers.” Sony had an edge in this race due to the fact that it’s headed up by Tom Rothman, who used to be at Fox and worked with Boyle on eight different movies there. Release dates have not yet been announced.

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    A sequel trilogy? Ffs, I love 28DL as much as anyone else, but I think a Magic 8 Ball would be able to run a production studio better than Hollywood at this point. Why would you ever greenlight three whole films to revive a 17+ year old zombie IP without testing the waters with just one good entry??

    • graymess@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      28 Days Later was also never a massive blockbuster movie. It was kind of a cult hit. A sequel titled 28 Years Later will definitely bring in some kind of audience, but I am doubtful about three back-to-back movies. The Strangers is doing the same thing. Why? What historical evidence is there to suggest that this is a smart idea? I just can’t imagine niche horror franchises are prime material for Marvel-ization.

      • sunbeam60
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wow, I’m usually the first one to dig on a movie but I thought 28 Weeks Later rocked and really expanded the universe. Now I’ll have to go watch it again.

      • DoctorButts@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, I saw this in theaters with a bunch of friends when it came out. I was the only one out of like 5 or 6 of us who hated it. This movie follows the Bad Movie Rule of: “characters put themselves into peril only because they make the stupidest possible decisions all the time.”

    • Moreless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      They just need to overt our expectations, put a female in it, and make her gay. Profit!

      • The Pantser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        They will make them trans and have a side story about how hard it is growing up trans in a zombie apocalypse.

          • Moreless@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Are you saying that people don’t want that? Cause that’s what audiences keep getting 😂

            It’s enough that South Park makes fun of it. Have YOU seen any movies?

            • graymess@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              9 months ago

              Oh yes, South Park, the mirror held up to society, a genuine reflection of what’s actually going on in the world. Surely not just a cartoon depiction of pop culture through the lens of two middle aged white guys whose shit take style of humor peaked 20 years ago.

              • Moreless@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                Why are you so angry? Profits are profits and that’s just how the big dogs do it. Accept it, embrace it. Cheers!