Seinfeld for me.

Closely followed by IT Crowd

I mean who the fuck would buy a Tesla in their right mind these days?! It’s impossible to look past the nazi leading it.

I didn’t, for me it was “Ai, Bee, See, Dee, Eee, Eff, Jee” (except in my local language Danish). My children all learnt phonics in their U.K. school and it’s taught them to read 5x faster I’d say).

Wtf, this is literally the opposite of true. PTX is nvidia only.

For most sites it’s a testing matrix issue. Most testing teams look at browser stats and choose how to apply their limited resources based on that. So the dev probably doesn’t even see the bug that exists for an old Firefox version as there’s no testing done on it.

I mean it is just so so dumb. Have people really got that short term memory that no one remembers who pushed for this in the first place?!

A lawyer’s opinion does not constitute a legal ruling.

What about those of us who never joined?

Lol, they did you a favour. It’s the only instance I ban.

Why not both?

Yes, as I said, it’s exactly the same. I’m really glad you’re here to make it so plain to everyone.

I’m a Dane living in the UK. This is beginner level Trump/musk idiocy. Denmark is currently wrestling with the US demanding a piece of their kingdom (and yes, Denmark is a democracy, so using the word kingdom may seem a bit anachronistic, but in this case we are talking about Greenland, which is an autonomous region of the Danish commonwealth, so the official term is “kingdom”)

Hmm, let’s see, one country was ruled by a murderous dictator using chemical weapons against his own people and crushing dissidents to a pulp in secret prisons. The other is a mature, functioning democracy with rule of law and a free press.

Yes, yes, I can see how you think that’s exactly the same.

Do you ever wonder why most Europeans has about 40 telecom companies offering you internet at your particular address? Regulation and anti-monopoly works.

Norske tilstande?! Får vi så vores olie tilbage?!

That may be the case but a Science article on the resume is still something every working scientist covets.

Because the journals provide a quality gate. To be published in, say, Nature is a career peak for most scientists. While counting references to a paper can tell you some things about its relative merit, it’s not as clear an indicator as having a PNAS, Cell or similar on your resume.

They have created a market for their name so it self-perpetuates.

Når vi alle bliver fyret. Husk på at produktet konkurrerer imod blot en årsløn pr team før du kan se en effekt.

The “now the tech is done can we rationalise the dev team?” fallacy just drives me up the wall. Mostly because I’ve actually worked in environments where those questions were seriously pondered and had to defend against it.

The best part is when some dufus goes “I’ve got a great idea and the grit to see it through. I just need to hire a tech person to do it for me”.