Det afhænger jo af opgaven. I Nordatlanten skal der mere end en korvet til, hvis du har planer om at være derude i lang tid.

Planen om at gøre de nuværende fregatter til Østersø skibe er fuldstændigt idiotisk. Minimum 100 besætning. De oprindelige patrulje skibe havde været perfekte til den opgave, hvis de var armerede nok.

Ubåde og mål. De er de enste skibe der findes.

real MVP right here.

It’s a pretty simple “acknowledged” to me. It’s a “I’ve not just seen your message, I’ve read it, and I have no further comments”.

I don’t think I’ve ever interpreted it as rude.

This isn’t necessarily a market answer though. In a well functioning country, government could intervene to disrupt the status quo. For example, in Denmark, the government mandated a very, very low fee card system (imaginatively called DanCard) that basically ran at cost rather than profit. While it’s a fully private system now, regulation still governs a maximum charge which is far lower than the fee for using a Visa or Mastercard or, worse, Amex.

In a world where government works on your behalf, actions can actually occur to benefit the citizens.

But you do understand that if credit card cash backs didn’t exist, prices would likely fall by more than the cash back?

They don’t need to edit the article, just submit a decent photo to wikimedia. The editing can be done by others as soon as the portrait has been uploaded.

I’m ascribing agency and competency to the military planners and to Rubio. Trump wouldn’t know which end of a lollipop to lick.

For Darwin sake, everybody can read this, right?

First Trump showed Ukraine that he can make Ukraine lose without US support. This brought them to the table again.

Now he aims to show Russia that they can’t win when Ukraine has US support. Trump will support Ukraine with new weapons and even more intel, possibly with permissions to use US weapons in deeper strike missions. This coincides with Trump getting Ukraine to agree to a ceasefire position (that Trump still doesn’t understand Russia will never agree to).

This will go on for 4-6 weeks, then Trump will realise “math is hard, yo” and properly give up on an attempt, blaming Russia, Ukraine and/or the EU.

Then by end of 2025 the recent Trump induced EU panic that caused Europe to react will have created a rapid expansion of European capability and will. Then the US will exit and the war will go on for another couple of years.

Darwin almighty if a celeb wants their photo changed on Wikipedia all they have to do is submit a decent photo they’ve taken themselves.

Ah right. But none of them are true forks, really. They still rely on the Firefox project to port features in etc.

Oh no.

100%. Firefox would be better off, I suspect, by focusing on the browser, solely, and with a distributed global team that didn’t need a fancy SF office and fancy SF comp packages.

Servo isn’t a functional browser. You’re not comparing apples to apples.

Which ones do you mean?

Yo ho, to the seas we go!!

Correct.

If we don’t stop Russia in Ukraine and we don’t stop Russia in the Baltics then we might end up having stop them in Poland and Germany, yes. And if you can’t see that, I believe you would benefit from studying history.

Besides, we aren’t rearming to fight with Russia. We are rearming to ensure we don’t have to fight with Russia.

Spot on!

So ok, that’s not one trillion.

I live outside of a big city in the UK. Many times I can ONLY get 2G.