People blame Nader for 2000 Florida, but the truth of the matter is that, had the counting been allowed to finish, Gore would have won.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/jan/29/uselections2000.usa
The other interesting bit is that the butterfly ballot they used siphoned off enough votes from Gore to Pat Buchanan to make the difference.
Here’s how it looked:
Bush was the top choice, Buchanan was 2nd, Gore was 3rd. But reading down the left hand side of the page, a significant number of otherwise Liberal Democratic voters, punched the 2nd box instead of the 3rd.
From the article:
[Nader]'s efforts resulted in the creation of some pillars of the regulatory state: the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Freedom of Information Act, and the Consumer Product Safety Act, among others.
He got his start with auto safety, which has probably saved millions of lives by now, but he proceeded from there to pretty much tireless work on progressive issues in Washington for his entire life. He was successful enough to fall into the groundbreaking musician’s trap, of “I don’t see what difference he made” because the things he created were so seismic that now they seem like part of the landscape.
Then maybe he should shut up.
This garbage that you’re posting is extremely offensive, @mozz. A national abortion ban would subject hundreds of millions of women to potential medical atrocities. Trump is promising to round up approximately ten million Latinos and send them to concentration camps.
Ralph Nader, Mother Jones, and you are helping to make that happen.
I fully agree with the idea that if Biden doesn’t win the upcoming election, the world including women and Hispanics and Palestinians and American soldiers and Democrats and a whole bunch of other people will be actively in danger. I’m voting for Biden in the general election.
I actually think Biden is a radical upwards departure from the Democratic norm; he’s concretely advancing a progressive agenda in ways that no Democrat since Carter has. Yes maybe it’s good to add that as explicit context when posting this article.
At the same time, I think it’s 100% justified as Nader does here to examine “how the fuck did things get to such a state that a Democrat like that could be in any kind of trouble as an incumbent in an election against literally one of the worst people in the world.” Since he’s someone who’s been involved in landmark legislative gains like the creation of OSHA, I think it’s relevant to listen to his critique of the media and the DNC establishment.
But yes, Biden definitely needs to win this particular election or else there will be a whole lot of suffering in many different places in the world. On that we can agree.
“how the fuck did things get to such a state…”
Because Ralph motherfucking Nader, and Mother Jones, and other scumbags like them, tore Americans away from reality and from sanity. That’s how.
Ah yes, the pervasive and poisonous influence of Ralph Nader and Mother Jones on American society has been well documented. If only we could put a stop to them, our electoral system would finally be functioning as intended.
I’m just gonna direct the next “don’t vote in the election it doesn’t matter” troll that I run across at you, and let you and them hash it out. I feel like you and me talking is unlikely to be productive.
Please don’t. I don’t want to argue with someone that dumb.
You for real made me laugh out loud 😃
I don’t think the person is dumb, maybe just panicked about anything that might lead to Trump, which I get. And yes I definitely believe there is fascist-enabling propaganda on this topic.
But in any case I appreciate the note, I will not attempt to redirect them to you or etc
Ironically, it is you who can’t realize that you and your ilk, together with the republicans, are what’s preventing real progress.
If we had 60 of his ilk in Congress you’d be complaining about how slow your universal health care is.
It’s always the 3% that voted 3rd party and never the 15% that swapped party. Your candidate couldnt even win his home state, if he did, he could have lost Florida and won the election. Blame your own party for your loss and quit trying to deflect responsibility to others
I think people should vote their conscience. I respect people who bothered to vote, even if it is for Kennedy, a third party, Abraham Lincoln or Hitler incarnate, or went to spoil their ballot. The ones that say it doesn’t matter and stay home is what I have a problem with.
I don’t and I’m all for voting your conscience. I’m also for voting solidarity and strategically. My conscience votes for making the outright fascist lose by as much as possible. And never standing a chance of winning.
I live in a red state that Biden stands no chance of winning ever. But I will be damned if it’s close and I happen to be one of the chucklefucks that could have made a difference but didn’t. Because I felt it was more important to protest vote in one of the most useless elections to protest vote. A Presidential election.
If you want to send one of the major parties a message start voting in state and local elections. Start filling their ranks with progressives socialist and communist. They will take notice. They will start appeasing them or risk losing their power.
They can safely ignore each and every single presidential protest vote in the history of the United states. Because since the country’s founding. The structure of presidential elections have always put it outside the reach of all third parties everywhere. And even if the unthinkable happened. A third party candidate made it into the office of the president. They would be a lame duck for change. Unable to make a difference without any sort of coalition or party to back them. Bad presidential candidates is a symptom of a greater disease in the body politic. You don’t solve the problem by doing a little pruning at the top. Pruning the top won’t change the underlying structure. You have to go for the root of the problem so to speak.
Each and every 3rd party or independent presidential candidate is either a grifter themselves or a tool for grifters. Jill Stein couldn’t win city dog catcher. Let alone president. The fact that every 4 years the money is there to run that moron for president. But the green party can’t be bothered to push candidates elsewhere. Where they might accidentally stand a chance of wining. That should tell you everything. There are thousands of state and local offices throughout middle America that Republicans run for and win unopposed. Almost as damming of Democrats as it is of every single other party in American politics.
3rd party presidential candidates almost always guarantee a fascist/Republican win. Coupled with the fact that most people can’t be bothered to vote on non-presidential years for anything ever. It pretty much guarantees that nothing will ever change and the status quo will stay in place. It’s a pretty Insidious and ingenious system. The perfect political hamster wheel if you will. Designed to keep the public tiring itself out getting nowhere. Where those in power can just continue to get worse and worse with impunity. As we argue and fight amongst ourselves.
Vote strategically, don’t vote strategically, I honestly don’t care. Even if your party has a 0% chance of winning I don’t care either. All I care is you cast your ballot in a way that you think is the best option, it shows you did something to advance your cause.
You should care. They should care. The whole point of voting, is because you care. You’re statement makes no sense.
I care that people care. I don’t value the political opinions of those who aren’t arsed enough to vote for anyone or at the very least make the effort to vote for no-one.
They’re functionally the same people.
From the presidential, DNC/RNC perspective yes you are correct. From my perspective and a civic duty perspective, people who don’t vote even if they reasonably could have (so excluding people in areas specifically disenfranchised by stupid voting rules and ID laws etc.) are lazy.
Nader actually talked about this and he has a significant experience with bringing progressive agendas to success in Washington. One of his big methods from early in the article was, build a big coalition and then promise votes to the Democratic candidate if they get on board with particular parts of the agenda you’re asking for.
But the point is, it’s targeted and there’s strategy. It’s not just this “both parties are the same!” (they aren’t) or “I’m just frustrated things are bad, I won’t vote!” (which will make things worse)
Thank you for this comment. Even tho you got downvoted by the people win this sub who don’t believe in democracy!
deleted by creator
