• iiGxC@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sometimes people have wrong opinions, don’t worry it happens to the best of us (/s)

        • summerof69@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          What kind of surveillance? I remember 6 years ago an admin of a paid org on Slack could download all conversations, including private.

          • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Any work tool is like that, including slack and teams. If you’re using a corporate device or tool paid for/managed by your employer, you have no privacy whatsoever. If you’re using the internet at work, IT knows at least which sites you visit

            Usually the logs/conversations don’t get read, they just have words that get flagged (from swear words to drugs to who knows what else), the rest is mainly in case something happens they can look into it more and maybe cover their ass.

            That said, I bet more data goes to microsoft from teams than goes to slack from slack, so in that case I bet slack is a bit better

          • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Most work/ school comms software is, and anyway if it isn’t encrypted they can just ask for it and Microsoft will probably give it to them

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I use Slack for personal projects and Teams for work. I think both are fine. The main reason it made sense to use Teams at work was because there were a number of products in use by different teams. IT had Slack and the rest had Zoom. Zoom was raising their costs and we already had Teams as part of 0365. So it was either buy Slack licenses for the entire company or just get everyone on Teams. It was kind of a no-brainer and it was hard to come up with a convincing argument to pay for Slack for everyone other than “Microsoft bad”.

      • BurningRiver@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        It’s funny you mention that about teams and O365. Microsoft just announced O/M365 licenses will be sold without Teams now, in the US. Something something antitrust lawsuit.