• lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    My point exactly. So the programmer who commented above me is wrong in saying it makes it easier for them

    • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No, still easier. They are still part of the year, so you can just count them, and the logic is still easier than the mess we currently have. If you really feel the need to you can call new years day the zeroth day in the zeroth month, the day of the week is Holiday, and periodically the zeroth month has one extra Holiday.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Computers store the date as “days after January 1st 1970”. So you have a huge number, divide it with 7 and get the day of the week. If there are days that don’t belong to any week, you have to calculate January 1st of that year and substrate it in addition to the steps above. I don’t say it’s not manageable, but it’s not easier

        • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          They store the number of seconds since the epoch of 1970, but you’re always going to have leap days and even leap seconds. Even if you changed the definition of a second to match the current length of a year, it would be off again relatively soon and you’d need leap seconds again. It’s NEVER going to be as simple as you seem to think it should be. Chaos and complexity is inherent in the whole system.

          • lugal@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I never said it was simple. The comment above me was “oh, this makes it much easier” and I was like “it’s not really getting easier”. That’s all I said.