• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Richard Pryor was early to mid 80s, not 90s-00s; and certainly you couldn’t do the same material today. Without doing a deep dive IASIP is very different in many ways to Pryor’s and Chapelle’s material - tone, content, format, delivery, context… in almost every way.

    What also a lot of people don’t want to countenance is that Pryor and Chapplle are African-American, McElhenney and Howerton are not. Who are the edgy black american comedians that are being “cancelled” today? And more crucially - some of the issues that formed Pryors stand up - ghettos, brothels and kids drug use - are much less prevalent today

    Pryor’s first special was released by the same publisher as Hard Days Night by the Beatles (MPI), so absolutely there was money involved there.

    Chappelle’s first TV appearance was on Def Comedy Jam, owned by $100MM record company Def Jam (it would sell for 150 mil a few years later - so that’s a guess but I think a fair one)

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      You’re talking about the labels or venue’s instead of talking about the comedians. Chappelle didn’t get that gig because he was made of money. He got it because all of his stand up shows leading up to that were liked and he got their attention. That’s how becoming a famous comedian works. You’re popular enough to get someone to notice you. It’s how most bands work, too. Motley Cru started off as nobody’s before getting noticed from a small venue where they were getting popular.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m not saying comedians are rich, I’m saying that the structures that support mainstream comedy are similar to those in all large organizations such as movies, music, Broadway…

        Thats not really the relevant point anyway.