• ParabolicMotion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    When I think of the Catholic Church, I consider the people that make the church what it is, not just the people at the top. A lot of Catholics spoke out about the abuse. One that stands out for sure was Sinead O’Connor. People forget she was Catholic. She was outraged and drew much attention to the issue. So did many other Catholics. I don’t consider the abusers of the church to be Catholic. Good Catholics shouldn’t have turned their backs on the church when that all unfolded; they are what makes the church a church and it needed good people to remain and be outspoken. I think church leaders tried to do damage control and it became a big cover up, which shouldn’t have happened.

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sinead O’Connor was excommunicated from the Catholic Church for trying to become a priest, so no, she wasn’t Catholic. She died a Muslim, and probably would have preferred we called her Shuhada.

      In reality she stopped being Catholic long before she ripped up a picture of the Pope. For more than 25 years she was Catholic only in a definition that would also include me - having been baptised as one. You seem to think lay Catholics have influence on the Church. They do not. Only in the form of donations, which practicing Catholics have never withheld. So I’m perfectly fine with the Church using those donations. Where else is it going to get money? Selling priceless artifacts?

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      One that stands out for sure was Sinead O’Connor. People forget she was Catholic. She was outraged and drew much attention to the issue.

      And how did both the Catholic Church and nearly every Catholic person (not just the people at the top) around the world react to that?