• Meansalladknifehands@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure, but inflation doesn’t factor in price hikes, for instance medical insurance, drug prices, house prices, rent, collage tuition or new expenditures that didn’t exist 20 years ago. These don’t follow the curve of inflation, they are artificialy inflated which is shown in increased profit margins.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Rent is literally a third of inflation calculation

        How do you complain it doesn’t factor it when it’s the biggest contributor?

        • Meansalladknifehands@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Dude, I’m not complaining I’m giving you examples of things that they don’t account for. Rent is different, you have landlords jacking the price to an extreme, and then you have those who follow the inflation curve. It’s just dishonest.

              • iopq@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                No, the inflation literally tracks housing costs. There are valid criticisms, and there’s not knowing what you’re talking about

                • Meansalladknifehands@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  you are the one misleading people posting graphs with no context, sorry but you are the one who make false assumption based on the graphs you are posting.

                  • iopq@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Which false assumptions? I explain my points clearly without brushing off other people. Be specific

    • webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Repeat same talking point.

      The things you say are useless, especially since these are adjusted by household size. Do one that isn’t.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Repeat same talking point.

        I’m not saying I agree with them, but they are the only ones providing actual data. Everyone else, including you, is just attacking and downvoting them. I would be interested in hearing an actual argument, but to accuse them of just “repeating a talking point” while they provide data and you provide nothing but a talking point is ridiculously hypocritical.

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Their data is adjusted for family size. Family size has been consistently shrinking since the 1960s, which, if you adjust their graph, will lead to overall decrease in wages throughout time. It is a meaningless method of transformation to get data that supports a false narrative.

          Why did you not point out that their data is transformed when I did?

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            You still haven’t provided any actual data. Again, you just hand wave it away.

            I’m not saying you’re wrong, I tend to believe you are right in fact, but if you can’t be arsed to actually defend your position - that’s fine - but its then hypocritical to claim the other person just repeating a talking point.