The Justice Department is suing Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott over a floating barrier that the state placed on the Rio Grande to stop migrants from entering the U.S.
How is it not a medical action? Or a naval action? Or any other action I make up? If you can’t show me it’s not the nonsense I make up then it must be the nonsense I made up ;)
Your right, but OP was incorrect in using the word policing when the Act passed by congress actually uses the words “domestic” law enforcement; (imo) arguably this includes any action that stems from edit: ACTING enforcing laws on domestic, as opposed to foreign, soil. Further the exceptions allow for military to “provide” resources that support domestic enforcement officer which (again imo) would not extend to ‘not providing/actually removing’ resources that domestic enforcement officers do already have…
All that to say what the act does do is create a grey area that can be argued either way and which does force the federal government to have to think twice about using the military for such matters… for better or for worse
Sending the military to remove an obstruction at the border is not policing.
What is it, then?
It’s removing an obstruction at the border.
So they’re janitors?
Are you unclear on what obstruction means?
I’m unclear as to what y’all think the military does I guess?
Seems like you’re unclear on a lot.
I mean I feel like I’m asking you how this is not a police action and you’ve given me nothing so ok
How is it not a medical action? Or a naval action? Or any other action I make up? If you can’t show me it’s not the nonsense I make up then it must be the nonsense I made up ;)
Your right, but OP was incorrect in using the word policing when the Act passed by congress actually uses the words “domestic” law enforcement; (imo) arguably this includes any action that stems from edit: ACTING
enforcing lawson domestic, as opposed to foreign, soil. Further the exceptions allow for military to “provide” resources that support domestic enforcement officer which (again imo) would not extend to ‘not providing/actually removing’ resources that domestic enforcement officers do already have…All that to say what the act does do is create a grey area that can be argued either way and which does force the federal government to have to think twice about using the military for such matters… for better or for worse
Edit for clarity