• lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    7 months ago

    10th time

    only now threatens jail time

    Correct me but any pregraduate law student who hasn’t been skipping on their classes could get rich by filing for the obvious bias the judges have to allow 10 contempts of court, wouldn’t they?

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is the second ruling of contempt

      First ruling was collectively over 9 comments he made.

      This is the second, and said next would be jail time.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is the second, and said next would be jail time.

        Didn’t they say that after the first as well?

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        This is still from the first batch of contempt charges. The judge ruled on 9/10 and wanted more information before ruling on the 10th

      • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So, if I am understanding correctly, as a citizen I can threaten a judge 9 times, or threaten 9 different judges, and demand that I can only be held accountable for only one of them, or for all of them as a package only once?

          • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Feel free to explain then, because from here it looks like El Trumpo should have been thrown to jail 8 contempts ago, like any normal citizen. Right now if I was a US citizen I would be justified in citing precedent that I can’t be sent to jail or even threatened with jail time with only 6 contempts.