• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    …but immediately jailing someone because they can easily afford the fine seemed wrong.

    No it doesn’t, not even a little bit! Restrictions on their time are the only things rich people understand; they should be jailed instead of fined early and often.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      And then they get the case cancelled because it’s clearly bias against them that they don’t get to just pay the same fee as anyone else as a first warning.

      • Dkarma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lol…that’s not how it works. You don’t get a case cancelled for the judge holding someone in contempt…

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You do if it’s Trump and he uses it to question the judge’s neutrality.

          How long do you think before they replace the judge and get things started again? If you believe it won’t be long enough to get him elected then I’ve got a bridge to sell you.