• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    They’re not the end all be all of genocide enders, but they’re very much valuable because the Israeli government can’t sacrifice Israeli civilians’ lives for a war half the population agrees doesn’t have a clearly defined goal. Or, well, they can, but the protests a few days ago show why that’s a bad idea.

    The protests are out of frustration with the government not doing more to return the hostages - but negotiation isn’t the only way to return the hostages. Force is also an option - and judging both by Israel’s previous actions and the invasion of Rafah, seems to be the Israeli government’s chosen route. And, purely strategically, it would be hard to say it’s the wrong decision.

    Correction: So technically it was a week but that aside, the idea was for a pause that would become “something more enduring” in Biden’s words. It didn’t work and that’s why Hamas is now not accepting anything less than a permanent ceasefire. I doubt they went into the deal expecting that it’d end in a week with no progress.

    The idea that the pause would become more enduring was wishful thinking after it was agreed to, and by Biden, not the parties involved, who needed to seem like he was trying.

    and it’s natural to think it will have more when Israel is more serious about trying to end the fighting (which will happen eventually; they can’t go on like this forever (hopefully)).

    That’s the thing - they don’t need to go on forever. Gaza is almost entirely occupied now. Once Rafah is under Israeli control, where more in Gaza can offer serious resistance? Fuck, man, they’re already building massive camps to ‘move’ the population to. Where is Hamas going to operate, to keep these hostages when that happens? And if Israel kills half of the hostages in the process of rescuing them, do you think that will lose Netanyahu any supporters who aren’t already against him? On the contrary, they’ll spin it as “Look at what the terrorists made us do!”, and if the Israeli left doesn’t swallow it, the centre almot certainly will.

    They’re not nearly valuable enough to call for a permanant ceasefire. Honestly, I’d say I’m surprised that a 40 day ceasefire is on the table for them - not now, with so little left to occupy - except that I don’t believe the Israeli offer is in good faith. Their value was never extremely high - half of it was spent earlier - and their value is reduced with every Hamas-controlled location that is overrun. Realistically, they’re not worth a permanant ceasefire to Israel, protests or not.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      So you’re making good points generally, but the protests I’m referring to clearly demanded a ceasefire so the hostages can return. They explicitly said that they wanted Netanyahu to make a ceasefire agreement and return the hostages.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Israeli society, already working on some 30+ (or 70+ depending on how you count it) years of dehumanization of Palestinians, has been rocked into a frenzy by the fear created by October 7, and by the abhorrent self-censorship of their own media on the subject of the attacks on Gaza. A large proportion of them would still be upset if it was a ‘permanent’ ceasefire, and very few would be upset if their relatives were retrieved by force rather than by negotiation. Most of them are desperate for their families back, and to feel safe from the prospect being held captive. As I said - there are more ways than negotiation to achieve this.

        Thank you for being willing to discuss this. Oftentimes I’m frustrated by running up a brick wall of principles. It’s not that they’re bad principles, but I’m generally interested in… well, as Bismarck described politics, “the art of the possible, the attainable, the second-best”.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Israeli society, already working on some 30+ (or 70+ depending on how you count it) years of dehumanization of Palestinians,

          Yeah make that a hundred.

          A large proportion of them would still be upset if it was a ‘permanent’ ceasefire,

          The protesters are actually calling for a ceasefire and have been for a while so at least it’s not as one-sided as you seem to think. No idea about the ratios though, so feel free to drop them if you’ve seen them.

          As I said - there are more ways than negotiation to achieve this.

          Yes, but none will actually work. How many hostages has Israel retrieved outside of negotiations? From a purely strategic point of view force is not working if your goal is to retrieve the hostages (which we know it’s not). Israelis aren’t upset because the IDF is attempting to retrieve the hostages using force; they’re upset because force can’t work without sacrificing a significant fraction of those hostages as both we and the Israeli public have learned in the past few months.