• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Basically a replicator arrives in a small town, and is freely available to use. At first it’s great, but then it’s not.

    I’m familiar with the story. It was popular in conservative circles in the same way “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” was popular.

    I’m not stranger to tech pessimism, but - setting aside the fantastic nature of the premise - there’s little to support the theory that economic surplus has been bad for social cohesion. Given enough free time, people tend to be remarkably creative and productive. And a great deal of modern social cohesion is predicated on a certain ambient abundance of energy, housing, etc.

    To quote Alfred Henry Lewis

    There are only nine meals between mankind and anarchy

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hadn’t thought of the story as explicitly conservative, but thinking about it again through that lens, I can definitely see it.

      As for the quote, I remember hearing it as “barbarism” instead of “anarchy,” but right you are. Actually, the search for more context lead me the full source (from his talk page), which is actually a really good read.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s not inherently conservative, just like the tragedy of the commons isn’t. However, its infuriate and most obvious takeaways are those that works appeal to a certain conservative mindset.