• 163 Posts
  • 12.9K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • IQ is largely a pseudoscientific swindle

    “IQ” is a stale test meant to measure mental capacity but in fact mostly measures extreme unintelligence (learning difficulties), as well as, to a lesser extent (with a lot of noise), a form of intelligence, stripped of 2nd order effects — how good someone is at taking some type of exams designed by unsophisticated nerds. It is via negativa not via positiva. Designed for learning disabilities, and given that it is not too needed there (see argument further down), it ends up selecting for exam-takers, paper shufflers, obedient intellectuals, ill adapted for “real life”. (The fact that it correlates with general incompetence makes the overall correlation look high, even when it is random, see Figures 1 and 2.) The concept is poorly thought out mathematically by the field (commits a severe flaw in correlation under fat tails and asymmetries; fails to properly deal with dimensionality; treats the mind as an instrument not a complex system), and seems to be promoted by

    • Racists/eugenists

    and

    • Psychometrics peddlers looking for suckers


  • High IQ men

    Christopher Michael Langan (born March 25, 1952) is an American horse rancher and former bar bouncer, known for scoring highly on an IQ test that gained him entry to a high-IQ society and for being formerly listed in the Guinness Book of Records high IQ section under the pseudonym of Eric Hart, alongside Marilyn vos Savant and Keith Raniere. The record was discontinued in 1990, as high IQs are considered too unreliable to document as world records.

    Christopher Langan’s support of conspiracy theories, including the 9/11 Truther movement, as well as his opposition to interracial relationships, have contributed to his gaining a following among members of the alt-right and others on the far right. Langan has claimed that the George W. Bush administration staged the 9/11 attacks in order to distract the public from learning about the CTMU, and journalists have described some of Langan’s Internet posts as containing “thinly veiled” antisemitism, making antisemitic “dog whistles”, and being “incredibly racist”


  • People who recommend negging are evil.

    I see people read “negging” on a spectrum from “playfully tease someone you’re interested in” to “ruthlessly abuse someone you consider your inferior”. And one of those is a lot more evil than the other.

    And negging is ALSO endorsed by, that’s right, none other than Jeffrey Epstein.

    Cause he read it in the same book that everyone else did.

    I swear, the actual original material - the biography of a guy who goes out and lives with a bunch of California douchebags, learns how to navigate the nightclub scene, and comes out of it thinking much less of the community than when he went in - is one of the most damning indictments of the PUA community you’ll find.

    But because people can’t seem to get past the third chapter… It’s like hearing someone say Hunter S. Thompson loved the Hell’s Angels.












  • He’s a professional virologist with the NIH.

    Then he should definitely know better and know why what he’s doing will ruin any chance he has of rapid certification.

    I think the consensus around self-experimentation in biomed is way less black and white than you’re making it out to be. E.g., Dr. Barry Marshall famously won a nobel prize for self administering H. Pylori.

    Marshall won a nobel prize despite self-administration. And he’s a popular example in large part because he’s one of the last of note. Setting aside the dangers of self-experimentation, there’s a host of issues ranging from the individual psychological (doctors are as vulnerable to sunk-cost fallacy as anyone) to broader problems of replication issues (publishing one-off successes/failures can lead to misinformation regarding the viability of a given therapy).

    As a counter-example, about ten years ago there was a huge media fixation on Reservatrol, stemming in part from scientists involved in the study boasting that they self administered to amazing effect. Consequently, the vaunted claims of the pharmaceutical - as an anti-aging drug and neuro-protectant - failed to bare out in practice. But it became a popular OTC remedy pushed by the Alternative Medicine folks.

    Ginseng, Garlic, St. John’s Wort, and Acai Berries underwent the same fad promotions. Dr. Oz, most prominently, made a career of pushing various alternative supplements and remedies that he claimed he personally used or he used on celebrity guests and show hosts to great effect.


  • “The bureaucracy is inhibiting the science, and that’s unacceptable to me,”

    There are a lot of genuinely good natured and ambitious people in this world. And the NIH is run by a fucking clown college, atm. So I respect this guy’s vibe.

    But self-experimentation is a huge taboo in bio-ethics for a litany of reasons. If this guy was a proper professional, he’d know that. And - if anything - this kind of recklessness inhibits plans for distribution at-scale for any kind of reputable provider.

    The second order consequence of this decision isn’t good for mass distribution. It invites this kind of technology (or, at least, the pastiche) to be picked up by huskters and con-artists.

    “One week of people dying from not knowing about this is not trivial.”

    Statements like this reek of quackery. Even if he’s legit, he’s talking like someone more interested in marketing his medicine than verifying its efficacy.