• Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    19 hours ago

    50-60 a day? Assuming a 7.5 h workday, or 450 minutes, that’s ~8 minutes per interview, pretty hard to keep up even for fake ones

      • Ulvain@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Even with group interviews… Let’s take the supposed profit, 300$, and assume it’s 100 pops at 3$ each, and for the sake of it let’s say revenue = profit in this case. That’s 100 purchases per day.

        The post claims 50 interviewees per day, so 2 purchases per interviewees.

        By groups of 10, that’s 5 cohorts spending 1h each with the interviewer, during which every. Single. Person. Buys 2 drinks?

        Humm!

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Uses other people’s money for both the product and service = “passive”.

      You’re not thinking enough like a grifter to grasp the “big-picture” thinking at work here.

      quotation marks = sacastic/fake in my usage, to be clear.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        You’re not thinking enough like a grifter

        I mean, its obviously a shit post. But I imagine spending a whole day doing fake interviews - 50 a day, five days a week, for a month - to make around $6k gross, and then tell yourself you can scale this up passively.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          That’s why you never stop at just one hustle!

          Enough scale, and why would you keep your day-job? … but you don’t have to be smart-enough for that to buy-into and sell this lifestyle!

          Congrats on pin-pointing why I leave my own true potential for grift and hustle on the table, save for moments of desperation where inaction would otherwise cost my family. That is to say, I sometimes borrow money from my mom, and that’s plenty evil enough for me.

  • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Branch out and rent one of those rooms for $100/day, hire an interviewer for $100/day. Rinse and repeat ad nauseam until Trillionaire.

  • PDFuego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This feels like another one of those funny jokes that someone will come along and ruin by telling me he’s serious.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This does not seem feasible and isn’t passive income at all because he’s actively doing stuff to make it happen.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I could believe someone might call it “passive” in their head (they’re not actively selling the thing, I suppose). Because having “passive income” seems to be a kind of status symbol for some people.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s “passive” because it uses his employers’ time and money to generate additional off-the-books income for himself.

      Same way many land-lords mortgage their rental properties close-to insolvency. Damn straigh, “passive”=using other people’s money.

      • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        I doubt he’s using company time if he does 50-60 interviews daily and doesn’t hire anyone. No company would pay you to do that.

        • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Your faith in corporate HR departments astounds me.

          OTOH, don’t count out reviews, promotions, discipline and other “interviews”. Also meetings, so many meetings.

          • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            No faith in corporate HR, but concrete knowlege of how payroll works. No company is your friend, they are there to make as much money off of you as possible. Internal meetings are not external interviews, if you were hired to do a job interviewing for a positons and you went through 50-60 people a day with no results, they would replace you.

            • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Don’t forget Ghost jobs and all the temp/recruitment agencies out there, but I did forget the “I never hire anyone” bit until your comment prompted me to check the pic again. Also, listings that only exist certain nepotism or racial/class hires, but they stild have to interview x number of excluded candidates for appearances’ sake.

              Personally, there were a few times I was head-hunted by what turned out to be middlemen trying to fill a quota. No in-person interviews, but to say the jobs they were recruiting for were a bad fit for my public credentials would be an understatement.

              I assure you, corporate non-sense knows no bounds, and I’m happy for you, that you’ve had the luck to avoid encountering some of the worst and most demoralizing of it.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s a Japanese vending machine design, and it’s half embedded into the jutting corner of that wall.

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    50-60 job interviews for a measly $300.

    Sounds miserable. I’d rather flip burgers for McDonald’s