• kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    germany should have always remained like this. i want 100,000 germanys. i want germans to have to have a passport to walk 5 feet

  • kleeon [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    hopefully they make rest of the world just as detailed

    also the start date looks to be around 100 years earlier than eu4 which is gonna be amazing

  • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    Man I really hope this one is good. I’ve played a lot of EU4 and damn, that game is garbage. It’s the only singleplayer game I’ve ever played that replicated the feeling of “that sucked, let’s play another hour” that you usually only get with competitive multiplayer games

  • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    stylistically it looks like the imperator rome map. if i were paradox i would want to avoid that association like a plague. regardless i doubt it’ll be good the way paradox is now.

    • YEP [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Opinion especially among the more hardcore map Gamers has kinda turned on imperator. Played it with the big fan mod that mostly just ads flavor stuff to fill out the map and it was head and shoulders above ck2 vic3. The mechanics are really quite good.

      • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah they put some work in post launch and it improved quite a bit. Plus it would be hard to be worse than EU4’s “watch points go up”

      • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        i liked it, what’s there is solid… as long as you play as rome. just like eu4 the mana point system sucks but managing ideal pop composition and different cultures and religions adds a layer of depth that the culture system in eu4 really lacks. it was mostly the lack of flavour that’s the issue and i never got around to modding it. all in all it was a miss for its time and paradox learned nothing from it.

  • thelastaxolotl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    cool they finally made provence an HRE member and looks like they are keeping the peasant republics of dithmarschen and frisia and the later is bigger now

    • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 months ago

      the map. the appeal is the map itself. definitely an aspect of number go up, but mostly that maps are beautiful.

      • memory_adept [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think terrain is beautiful, I don’t know about a mess of imaginary borders

        Personally when I fuck around with the real world map, I get a city and pick which part has the Cthulhu cultists and then I have people roll dice

        • daniyeg@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 months ago

          terrain is nice, but it’s always the same. simplified colored borders however tell your campaign’s story in a simple glance. when you see your blob twice the size of that stupid ai you’ve had a beef for the past two hours it’s satisfying.

          • memory_adept [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            always the same

            Makes sense in terms of explaining why it’s a core gameplay mechanic itself rather than just a line version of bases in rts

            I guess a core appeal of using real maps to me in gaming has always been “let’s find out what’s REALLY under Cheyenne Mountain” stargate style

    • DefinitelyNotAPhone [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      Think of it as a board game with nigh-infinitely deep mechanics that you don’t need to fully understand to enjoy. You can hop in, do some basic map-painting and feel good about yourself, and then one day you look a little more closely at a menu and realize there’s an entire other mechanic you’ve never touched that lets you squeeze just a bit more efficiency out of, only to realize there’s another, and another.

      Paradox games are tar traps for nerds in the best possible way. The kind of people who are good at these games make those people who play Dark Souls on a banana look like amateurs in sheer nerd-dom.

      • memory_adept [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Dark souls doesn’t require any spreadsheeting if you know the core mechanics you can beat it with a shit build sorry to be annoying but comparing everything to a fighting game with rpg mechanics that gradually change weapon damage by like 4% to get over the threshold from 3 to 4 hit kill or some combo of specials and regulars thereof kinda irks me

        • Formerlyfarman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thats description is how paradox games work. you stack modifiers of +2 gold +0.1% growth +20% combat eficiency +2attack, etc. Some of those are given randomly so you savescum so the rng gives you the modifier you want.

            • Formerlyfarman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              8Thats because its cheap to implement and adjust such mechanics. When they are selling a new dlc every other week, they cant follow a simulation aproach. So they put together a script with a bunch of events that give random modifiers.

              But even back then when they tried a bit, there were still lots of such modifiers and events. Its just that they were hidden or made sense in world. Now its all just hoarding abstract types of mana and casting the modifiers.

              That being said making a simulation is incredibly hard. Back then chris king even build his world around marxist materialist ideas(he gave a presentation on this once) but it produced wierd bugs, liquidity crises, general gluts, etc were very common. The economy would often run out of coal and iron mid 19th century, and so on. Nobody could tell why things that worked worked or viceversa. It was somewhat fixed by balancing the coeficients, adding events and adding infinite dumps of resources and infinite workspace in provinces, so the company does not wamt to get into that mess again. Even then a lot of the game was stacking moddifiers but it was more subtle and somtimes counter intuitive.

              At the end of the day you have your equations regulating how the game works, and there are several coeficients that balnce and adjust them, changing those coeficients is the easy way to change the outcomes.

              • memory_adept [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                menu games and map games interest me because hypothetically they could have deep mechanics like some dwarf fortress shit but yeah i can see some appeal of what they end up being ig, it’s like people keep rerolling until they finally get pure himmler world with the weird mods, not for me personally,

                • Formerlyfarman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  On the one hand its cheper to program the rolls than a deep mechanic. On the other rolling the dice is increadibly addictive.

                  So their bussines model is to sell a new type of dice every month and milk the nerds.

                  Even if you are a pirate like me the constant updates makes it imposible to play strategically. But its very profitable.

    • Rx_Hawk [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s strategy, deceit, roleplaying, economic planning, alliance building, war, etc.

      One time I tried to explain EU4 to a friend in one sitting and I definitely came off as a crazy person. I can’t think of a more complex game.