maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgexternal-linkmessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1207cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1207external-linkFailed replication of claimed superconductor reported on arxivarxiv.orgmaegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square67fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareTheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoNope, but I’m leaning toward the side of caution. If the super-conductor is real it will be shown as such within a few weeks and will be revolutionary, and if not I’ll be less disappointed if I’ve steeled myself to the possibility.
Nope, but I’m leaning toward the side of caution. If the super-conductor is real it will be shown as such within a few weeks and will be revolutionary, and if not I’ll be less disappointed if I’ve steeled myself to the possibility.