The ban was imposed by the Trump administration after the accessory was used during the 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas.
  • derf82@lemmy.worldEnglish
    5·
    1 year ago

    My point is, they did not rule a ban unconstitutional, since they asked where it was in the constitution.

    • catloaf@lemm.eeEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      I read it as asking where in the Constitution there is a right to bump stocks. Did you read as asking where the ban is?

      • derf82@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        And there is no constitutional right to bump stocks. They just ruled there is no current law against it. If there was a constitutional right to them, you couldn’t ban them even with a law.

        I didn’t say he was asking where the ban is.