sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2年前Internet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court winarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1381cross-posted to: france@lemmit.onlinenews@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1381external-linkInternet Archive forced to remove 500,000 books after publishers’ court winarstechnica.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2年前message-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: france@lemmit.onlinenews@lemmy.worldhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2年前 Their distribution of books is completely legal. Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour. You just contradicted yourself in two sentences.
minus-squarenintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2年前Oh, you believe law is fair? You sound so cute.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2年前What did I say that implied that? I’m pointing out a contradiction in kilgore’s comment, I’m not adding anything of my own here.
You just contradicted yourself in two sentences.
Oh, you believe law is fair? You sound so cute.
What did I say that implied that? I’m pointing out a contradiction in kilgore’s comment, I’m not adding anything of my own here.