• Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    6 months ago

    The gameplay is perfect. But how about just fixing the PC version with some basic things like…

    1. A setting to disable chromatic aberration.
    2. Fix the broken ultrawide support.
    3. Add remappable keybinds.
    4. Unlock the framerate.
    5. Add DLSS and FSR.

    You know, basic, fundamental PC features.

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fromsoft PC ports have always been notoriously bad, but it blows my mind that after 15 years, they still don’t support something as important as custom keybinds.

      • Veraxus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Flawless Ultrawide can also be used to fix most of those things, but in either case, EAC will block you from online play… which is, like, half the fun of a FS game.

    • mortalblade@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      The keybinds are mostly rebindable though actually? I play on mouse & keyboard with basically completely different setup than default.

      From Soft PC ports definitely rough, though they have gotten a bit better each release

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The game is not “difficult” per se, it’s just that the underlying systems of how to make it easier aren’t made explicit. You’re meant to engage with it and learn how to create the advantages you need. It’s supposed to be a process of learning and growth that feels rewarding and earned. Or read a guide.

    It’s honestly one of the easiest From games, once you engage with the particulars. Let me be clear: This isn’t an elaborate “git gud”. That began as an ironically bad opinion that inevitably became a genuine opinion held by fools.

    Engage with the systems and dynamics presented to you, and you begin to see that the difficulty setting in ER (and other Souls games) exists on a conceptual level.

    The exception that proves the rule here is Sekiro, which was an amazingly interesting experiment in putting you into a character’s shoes through game mechanics - the only way to beat the game is to adopt the bold and precise combat style of the main character. The difficulty of that game comes from hesitation, fear, and carelessness - and it is painfully unforgiving.

    • wer2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      To follow on to this, the “best” build may not be the best for you and how you play. Try out various things to see what feels right to you. Sword and board, magic, gish, dual wield, big two hander, bigger two hander, etc. All of them are viable to beat the game, so find the one you like the most/is easiest for you.

    • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s honestly one of the easiest From games, once you engage with the particulars.

      I see this being said from time to time and I thought it was just me not “Gitting Gud”, so after being filtered by Captain Niall even with my mimic summon, I went through and cleared Demon’s Souls, Dark Souls 1 and 3, Bloodborne, and Sekiro all for the first time, and they were a fucking breeze compared to Elden Ring. I used a strength scaled zweihander in the Demon/Souls games to have the closest comparison possible (and also because I think it looks good). I guess it depends on which weapons you enjoy using, but the fact that there’s such a big skill discrepancy between entire weapon categories is in itself a pretty big stain on Elden Ring’s claim to be an RPG.

      edit: I shouldn’t say they were all a breeze. Bloodborne and Sekiro were difficult for sure. Not even close to comparable to my experience with Elden Ring though.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I guess it depends on which weapons you enjoy using, but the fact that there’s such a big skill discrepancy between entire weapon categories is in itself a pretty big stain on Elden Ring’s claim to be an RPG.

        They’re fundamentally different play styles. Difficult to you doesn’t mean that that’s what’s most difficult for someone else. You engage from different spacing, move differently, and pace your attacks differently. When most of the difficulty from combat is about learning what gaps you can exploit and how to protect yourself against different enemies with different attack patterns, that difficulty is going to vary heavily based on what your previous experiences are and how you intuitively understand the concepts. It’s what “git gud” actually means. FromSoft games force you to learn the mechanics of the combat, and calling strength based sword “harder” than a magic build is mostly about what style clicks better with you personally.

        Gameplay wise, FromSoft games are as pure ARPG as it gets. Stats matter a lot and the combination of stats and gear fundamentally changes the optimal approach to encounters. Most RPGs have higher and lower barrier to entry classes, and most RPGs have variation in skill floor and skill ceiling of different types. The biggest difference is that most RPGs with comparable depth don’t have anywhere near the level of fidelity mechanically.

        • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yes, I understand. I am claiming that colossal weapon users simply have less gaps to exploit and aren’t provided with enough advantages to compensate for the lack of attack opportunities for most bosses. And after playing the other souls games, this lack of opportunity is made even more readily apparent in comparison.

          My time with bloodborne (saw cleaver) and sekiro (there is only one playstyle) gave me a taste of From Software’s design when they decide to treat your playstyle as a first class citizen, and I had a wonderful time. I just didn’t get that same feeling at any point in Elden Ring is all.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s pretty interesting. I fully agree that builds differ a lot in terms of how much they depend on player skill in these games, and I can see how that’s not necessarily a good thing - but it is rather to my point that it’s part of the “difficulty settings” that I’m arguing are intrinsic to the game mechanics. You’re meant to choose your own difficulty setting in this way, and I think it was a deliberate choice to make it so, and not a failure to balance everything to equality.

        I still haven’t beaten BB or Sekiro, but DS 1+3 were pretty doable. I admit I haven’t gotten through all of ER yet, though from my experiences so far I feel that’s mainly due to work and parenting being such a drag on my mental energy.

        I used to power through these games in a very slow, mistake-prone fashion. I’ve never been what you’d call “gud” at these games, which is pretty much my point - but it’s only a matter of troubleshooting the difficulty on my own terms (if I ever have free time and no burnout at the same time again, wish me luck on that).

        • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah, after thinking it through, I can see where my confusion came from. Elden Ring might be significantly easier or significantly harder than the other Souls games depending on how you played the other Souls games.

          I guess I wish that they had provided more scaling variety within the various build types instead of across them.

  • Lyre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    I used to have a friend who was born with his left hand disabled and could only really play videogames on easy unless they had heavy accessibility options. Whenever i see these weird “dark souls needs to be hard” people i cant help but think about him and how he’s barred from playing these deep, visually impressive games because the community starts sending death threats at the mere mention of an easy mode.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      6 months ago

      Accessibility like controller input options is not the same as “you have more health and can dodge more”.

    • Zo0@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree with you that some people are misguided and expect dark souls to be hard for the sake of being hard. Yes you die a lot but that is part of the game, and dying is not a state of failure but a step in getting better in order to overcome the obstacle.

      I have seen people not only beat the game but do a no hit run with guitar hero guitar, dance dance gamepad and even raw potatoes. Making the game easy does not equal to making it ‘accessible’, but it does break the core gameplay loop. There are ways to make games more accessible in general that doesn’t ruin the fun factor. Check out AbleGamers they are doing amazing work helping the community which I think is one of the best ways to go about this issue.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          Counterpoint, no matter the accessibility options included, there’s always going to be a disability that isn’t compatible. The only game that everyone can play is “sitting alone in your room” and some people even struggle with that. There’s always going to be some level of ability required. As much as that sucks, that some people just won’t be able to experience a thing, it sucks more to have no one experience it for fear of excluding those who can’t.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            What gets me is a lot of people in the education world are starting adopting this bullshit attitude. My city removed advanced level math courses from middle/high school because it was ‘unfair’ to students who lacked the talent/drive to be good at maths… basically handicapping everyone because a subset of the students were bad at math. Basically nobody is allowed to be better than someone at something and pursue their talents… because that is ‘mean and hurtful’. WTF

        • AnotherOne@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          man without legs can’t run a marathon! who would have guessed? I mean disabilities suck(obviously) but being disabled means some things are impossible, that’s why disabilities suck! If you had to enable EVERYONE to be able to do EVERYTHING that would be really nice and all, but quickly turns into an impossible task. I’m disabled myself, there are things i can’t do, things that i will never be able to do. but i don’t expect everyone else to bend over backwards to make my life easy. life is suffering, living is hard, and everyone has their own problems. i can’t eat what i want, others can’t play the games they want to play. I’m not going to show up to a restaurant expecting them to know/care/be able to provide, i check beforehand, accept the problems i have, and deal with it. no one without legs will be the worlds greatest runner, no one with poor reaction time will beat eldenring, etc. that’s why it’s called a DISability you are unable to do something.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Thanks for having a good attitude. Way too many folks these days… are whiny and entitled and think nothing should be enjoyed by anyone if they can’t enjoy it. I’m athletic and I enjoy difficult/complex video games… and it’s always bizarre to me how some folks get some angry at me for enjoying things they don’t/can’t. I can’t play grandmaster level chess or a musical instrument, but I’m not angry about it.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    6 months ago

    I really wanted to like ER. It’s fucking beautiful and seems to have a lot of depth, but the a appeal to difficulty doesn’t really hold any water, cuz the only thing that makes it difficult is unnecessarily clunky controls.

    Maybe there’s a mod or something now that makes the combat more fluid… I should give it another visit.

    • nyar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      6 months ago

      What are you even talking about? In what way are the controls clunky?

      • Grass@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        6 months ago

        soulslike mechanics probably feel clunky to people that don’t really play soulslike. That said a bunch of things totally are clunky like cycling through spells and items which hasn’t significantly changed since dark souls, and for people that would rather take their time browsing the items walking while the menu is up is probably pretty jarring. Probably other things. It really has come a long way from demon souls but I honesly kinda prefer the jankiness of the older games.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s been a while, but I recall most attacks having an obnoxiously long animation, and that animation being set in stone once you trigger it. There is no aborting a sword-swing midway through to dodge or block. And if you make the mistake of pressing the attack button twice, apparently there’s a built-in ability queue that can’t be disabled, so you have to wait for the first animation to completely play through, then wait again for a second animation to play from start to finish.

        It makes it extremely unresponsive. That unresponsiveness seems to be what most folks are talking about when they’re applauding the game’s “difficulty”… but you could make any game that flavor of difficult by obstructing the controls.

        • LinyosT@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 months ago

          obnoxiously long animation, and that animation being set in stone once you trigger it. There is no aborting a sword-swing midway through to dodge or block.

          The whole point of the animations being set in stone is to force the player to be mindful of their actions. Don’t commit to an attack unless you’re sure it’s safe to do so. Otherwise you’re going to get caught out.

          The slow animations are a deliberate drawback to the more powerful weapons. Being able to swing an UGS around like it’s nothing would make for a fairly unbalanced weapon. If you want a weapon with quicker animations you probably want something more DEX focused. Just look at the Falcion’s animations compared to the Zweihander’s animations in Dark Souls for example. Zweihander puts out bigger damage numbers and thus attacks slower. Pretty basic balancing concept to have thing that does big damage be slower.

          The lack of being able to abort moves is simply a way for the game to punish poor decisions. If you get caught out by a slow animation then you probably need to work on picking when to attack. A big part of the game is that it teaches the player through punishing mistakes. That’s why it forces you to commit to actions.

          These only come across as clunky if you’re not learning from your mistakes and working around these deliberate limitations. Pick different weapons or pick better moments to attack/use an item so you don’t commit to something at the wrong moment.

          The input queue is another thing that lines up with this. I believe the whole point is to, again, push the user into being careful. Dark Souls isn’t a hack and slash like DMC. You don’t want to go into fights button mashing. The game wants you to take your time. The button queue kind of reinforces that by punishing button mashing and being too hasty. I do also find it useful in queuing certain actions like attacking straight out of a roll or following item usage.

          All the things you describe as clunky each have a purpose. The game expects you to work with those limitations and when you do you get a better experience. Going against them is when you run into issues. Since youre attempting to doing things the game is trying to discourage. Like button mashing (input queue) and getting too greedy with attacks (Being locked to actions/Longer animations).

          • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            I understand the reasoning behind it all, but those design decisions add up to it being clunky. Being intentional and with purpose doesn’t change that.

            • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              It’s one of the most fluid, responsive games I’ve ever played.

              Making you commit to moves when you make them isn’t clunky.

              • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Making you commit to moves when you make them isn’t clunky.

                What is it?

                It’s cool if you don’t mind the clunk; apparently it’s a selling point… but that doesn’t mean it’s not there.

                • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It’s standard practice. In fighting games, monster hunter, and a bunch of other games, really similar rules apply; you hit the button, an animation you know the duration and length of plays. This game has animation canceling, meaning you actually don’t have to wait for the return to idle animation to end before you can queue another attack or straight up cancel the animation with another (like a roll or parry). It’s literally made less clunky by letting you skip out of these committal attacks.

                  Your take is uninformed and you obviously don’t play much of the genre, ER is extremely generous outside of specific bosses in letting you just hit the roll button repeatedly after every action.

                • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Correct design.

                  Clunkiness is when precise execution doesn’t matter. Elden Ring is the polar opposite. The skill ceiling is extremely high as a direct result of how smooth and responsive the mechanics are. It just requires strategy instead of stupidity.

                • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It’s good game design.

                  If you wanna button mash to victory go play assassins creed lol

    • keimevo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      6 months ago

      One could accuse Elden Ring of many things, but clunky controls is definitively not one of them.

      It’s probably one of the best combat systems I’ve ever played. When you die, you know it’s your fault (usually because of greed), not the system cheating you. It’s very fair, unlike many others.

      • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I mean, bosses input reading my heavy attack to suddenly turn their three move combo into a four move combo 50% of the time feels a bit lame. For instance the dancing lion suddenly going into the spray carousel after it would have exhausted its combo and rested otherwise. My main issue is on the inconsistency.

        Don’t get me wrong, that fight was really fun and I overcame it, but there are many such cases where it feels overtly like the game just threw in the extra attack as a “fuck you” while trying to learn the mechanics. There might be a subtle cue to the boss’s body language I didn’t see but there’s also the issue of the camera in encounters with large enemies.

        On the whole though, as frustrating as it may be at times, often there’s still an underlying pattern. The only fights I think are explicitly unfair are the ones with adds or multiple enemies that add a lot of uncertainty especially if some are off camera. The twin gargoyle fight comes to mind, as does the Godskin duo where you explicitly have to kill both around the same time or the other respawns.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which stats? I put over 100 hours into ER if that’s what you’re looking for. Like I said, I really wanted to like it, and ‘got gud’ (learned to time the control’s clunkiness) enough to progress a decent way through the game. But it never actually got fun, nor did it live up to the wildly positive feedback it was getting from the gaming community. ER is an okay game. 5/10. It’s not bad by any stretch, but it’s not the posterchild of a perfect game that it was/is lauded as.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        People are allowed to not like games you like …

        I also find souls likes to feel janky. Elden Ring is playable for me, Dark Souls 3 I just rage quit rather than dealing with its UI.

          • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            They couldn’t even be bothered to report the correct keys if you use anything but an xbox controller or allow custom key binds in Dark Souls 3. I will never understand the praise the Dark Souls 3 PC port got.

            • mortalblade@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              They actually do let you rebind most keys, and they do also have a setting that changes the button prompts to keyboard buttons though I recall it being sorta hidden.

              • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                This is true. The only game to automatically detect my controller and display the correct buttons without going into a menu to change them in recent memory was Remnant 2. Extremely rare afterthought type quality of life is what we’re seeing complaints about now.

  • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    After 100%ing the game, seeing some of y’all complaining is something else. Reeks of not even trying to learn.

    • Luminocta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Getting oneshot by most enemies is not “difficult” it’s lazy. Just upping damage on enemies is lazy. Take out the healing system if you want difficult. Dont just maximize damage.

      Not trying to learn is such a weak excuse because you completed the game. I did so too and I think the game is less enjoyable because there is literally no room for mistakes. As unforgiving From software games are, this is just lazy design in my opinion.

      • Axeman666@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 months ago

        Plenty games have you die with one hit https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/OneHitPointWonder

        Many of those games don’t have difficulty sliders either. At least with Elden Ring there are ways to make your character sturdier if you wanted to. Fingerprint shield or greatshields in general are a great start. Stat dump in health. Wear heavy armor. Grind out as many levels as you need to. It works the same as any other game. It’s not like there’s a permanent game over where you have to start over. Dying and growing have been the point of these games and most games since like the beginning of gaming.

        • Luminocta@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          The dying is not the problem, that is part of the game. The problem here is that damage output of enemies is so exaggerated that even simple non-bosses can one shot all builds unless you go for ultra tanky. So basically what you’re saying is, don’t get hit or build specific tanks and not what you enjoy or you will die.

          Also my quarrel is mainly with Elden Ring DLC, not every game. Base game is not bad with balancing honestly. The DLC is just ridiculous. And for the love of god, just because some people get kicks out of difficulty doesn’t mean it has to be more extreme every new instance. That fanbase sheep mentality will kill good games like this.

          Dark souls 3 was more forgiving in the DLCs than this game.

          • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can get ~60% damage reduction BEFORE ARMOR in this dlc. This one is on you buddy. Explore.

            • hswolf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              6 months ago

              right? I’m lvl 170, 60vit and light armor (fashion)

              I only die if I get pummeled down, stun locked or get hit consecutively by charged attacks

              the dlc is indeed harder, but nothing unfair

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m 75% through and have had very few issues with the game man. But yeah, bosses take time to learn and figure out. Takes me about a dozen tries per boss then I’m smoking them.

        Learn the patterns, equip the right buffs, and it’s really not that hard.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    And that’s why I will never buy it. If you’re too asshole to put in difficulty scaling, I have no use for your game.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 months ago

    Not being able to grab a wooden club and beat god to death with it isn’t the game being difficult, but you listen to some folks and you might get the idea its what they expect.

    Use summons, get your magic going (or hell, full sorcerer) and you won’t see any major filters. Might need to do fights a couple times but thats hardly a big deal.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The problem is that the controls for anything other than the fighting are rather clunky. It’s not something specific to ER, but rather gamepad based games, for some reason. I’ve the same issue with Horizon Zero Dawn. In both games I play pretty much with the weapons, the healing and that’s about it because fuck all that shit about cycling through options in the middle of a fight.

      • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        You can long-press d-pad down to reset the inventory belt to the first item, same thing with the spells on d-pad up

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I wish long press would just show us a choice wheel, right thumbstick to pick my choice, done. Free the left and right foe other stuff.

          • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t know, that’s too many inputs which is a trap that I feel console games easily fall for nowadays. Having to long press is already kind of annoying, adding another input layer with a wheel would make it worse imo

      • homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        You sound like everyone who has ever seen me menu spells in a KH speedrun. You sound like someone who turns weapons off in ULTRAKILL. Neither of these are explicitly bad things, but the system in place (a scrollable selection menu in real-time) can be utilized at the same level of efficiency as a spell wheel; you just need to exercise your memory when you set up and when you use your belt items.

        There’s a lot of titles that allow you to pause and utilize your menu. Dragon’s Dogma 2, for instance, allows you to pause at 0 HP and still use healing items, so long as you haven’t finished your dying animation or been knocked flat.

        Dark Souls and similar games make a deliberate choice in keeping the game in real time when you menu, and there’s a lot of truly functional items you can keep on your belt to help those weapons: status items can help you finish applying a status when an enemy leaps back, the physick, stamina regeneration, many extremely powerful effects that they want a small execution and collection barrier on. Alone in the Dark (5) had a real-time menu like this too far before it was popular, and people complained bitterly about it, so I get where the complaint comes from.

        Without dramatically reducing your available options or developing a completely different system of menus, the controls can’t really be less “clunky”. If horizon’s wheel and DaS’s menu aren’t for you, you may just not like how action RPGs control. If it’s about needing time for the menu, these specific titles may not really be up your alley. There’s a TON of games that operate the way you’re expecting, and at this point the community and developer alike are committed to sustaining this experience that provides friction. Friction is basically how you talk, from a design standpoint, about the difficulty of the game and why it’s present and what it does functionally.

        If you don’t understand how friction and fun are related, the game was unironically not made for you, and misunderstanding that or not being eloquent enough to explain that has led to the “git gud” divide. The menus are meant to provide friction. The combat animations and the period you must wait before acting again provide friction. Being a relatively heavy RPG, you can overcome friction multiple ways, either through developed personal skill or overleveling or picking tools that the boss isn’t equipped to handle or statuses it’s weak to.

        TL;DR of course the menus are clunky dude they’re based on a decades-long tradition of interfaces that provide gameplay fun. The fun is there for a grand majority of people, if you’re not having fun with the ball-crusher, nobody is making you use it.

        • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I do appreciate your point of view. I just disagree about the “it’s been like this for ages and we’re used to it and it’s part of the difficulty”. Good UI should cause no friction.

          I do agree a paused menu with quaffing health potions mid-strike is bullshit. But if things are gonna be real time (not even slow down while in menu wheel like many others) then there is no reason to stick with ancient traditions. It would be simple enough to have an item wheel instead.

          As it is yeah, I do play with a handicap. It’s fine, I’ve beaten other games with similar issues (from my POV). I’m just super annoyed about subpar UX in software. I’ve seen too many in my career and too many people enduring bullshit UI… so it really rustles my jimmies when I see the same problems in games. You know, software that’s supposed to provide fun.

          It’s really not an ER specific pet peeve of mine; I’ve endured shitty UI/UX for the last 37 years and so I’m a bit grumpy about it, is all.

  • rainynight65@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lots of very roundabout ‘the game isn’t difficult, you just need to get good at it’ replies in this thread, trying hard not to say the quiet part out loud…

  • Axeman666@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Elden ring isn’t hard. People just need to learn to adapt and try new builds. This game is too massive to play with one build unless you go for something OP. That’s why they give you so many tears to reclass. Learn weaknesses and resistances, use ranged attacks, use summons, use everything you have at your disposal. That’s the whole point of the game.

  • leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    for me, the “difficulty” lies in wind-up, cooldown and range of weapons. everyone also gets a “stagger”/balance gauge which adds more depth to your arsenal.

    the way you use that against the npcs uptime with the current terrain is a typical souls experience.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Having played through its entirety last week for my review, though, I can confidently say that it’s not unfair, as every foe possesses learnable movesets with consistent, readable telegraphing (the base game actually had a few problems with this).

    While Shadow of the Erdtree is home to some of FromSoftware’s toughest ever boss fights, finally taking them down after hours of patient perseverance led to some of the highest highs I’ve ever felt playing a game.

    I couldn’t help but loudly cheer despite the fact it was 1:30 in the morning (sorry, neighbors) when I finally beat Rellana, Twin Moon Knight — the first or second boss you’re likely to encounter — in a (self-imposed) duel with no summons.

    Shadow of the Erdtree takes what the base game did and does it better, cutting away most of its formulaic side content like simple mines and catacombs and giving its players a denser world with more bespoke and original things to find.

    Neither pillar of Elden Ring’s gameplay would give me the satisfaction they do if the experience was designed to be easier or to hold my hand, so I’m in full agreement with Miyazaki’s comments.

    In fact, that’s a big part of why the Land of Shadow is so enjoyable to explore — new weapons, armors, spells, talismans, Spirit Ashes, and more are scattered all throughout the DLC’s various zones, with particularly special items often located within or at the end of side dungeons.


    The original article contains 710 words, the summary contains 244 words. Saved 66%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!