So, I have a python script I’d like to run from time to time from the CLI (on Linux) that resides inside a venv. What’s the recommended/intended way to do this?
Write a wrapper shell script and put it inside a $PATH-accessible directory that activates the virtual environment, runs the python script and deactivates the venv again? This seems a bit convoluted, but I can’t think of a better way.

  • Faulkmore@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    @Andy The convention is to place the venv in a .venv/ sub folder. Follow the convention!

    This is shell agnostic

    Learn pyenv and minimize shell scripts (only lives within a Makefile).

    Shell scripts within Python packages is depreciated

    • Andy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The convention

      That’s one convention. I don’t like it, I prefer to keep my venvs elsewhere. One reason is that it makes it simpler to maintain multiple venvs for a single project, using a different Python version for each, if I ever want to. It shouldn’t matter to anyone else, as it’s my environment, not some aspect of the shared repo. If I ever needed it there for some reason, I could always ln -s $VIRTUAL_ENV .venv.

      Learn pyenv

      I have used pyenv. It’s fine. These days I use mise instead, which I prefer. But neither of them dictate how I create and store venvs.

      Shell scripts within Python packages is depreciated

      I don’t understand if what you’re referencing relates to my comment.

      • logging_strict@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The multiple venv for different Python versions sounds exactly like what tox does

        Then setup a github action that does nightly builds. Which will catch issues caused by changes that only tested against one python version or on one platform

        py313 is a good version to test against cuz there were many modules removed or depreciated or APIs changed

        good luck. Hope some of my advice is helpful

        • Andy@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thanks, yes, I use nox and github actions for automated environments and testing in my own projects, and tox instead of nox when it’s someone else’s project. But for ad hoc, local and interactive multiple environments, I don’t.

            • Andy@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              No, I don’t use GHA locally, but the actions are defined to run the same things that I do run locally (e.g. invoke nox). I try to keep the GHA-exclusive boilerplate to a minimum. Steps can be like:

              - name: fetch code
                uses: actions/checkout@v4
              
              - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
                with:
                  allow-prereleases: true
                  python-version: |
                    3.13
                    3.12
                    3.11
                    3.10
                    3.9
                    3.8
                    3.7
              
              - run: pipx install nox
              
              - name: run ward tests in nox environment
                run: nox -s test test_without_toml combine_coverage --force-color
                env:
                  PYTHONIOENCODING: utf-8
              
              - name: upload coverage data
                uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4
                with:
                  files: ./coverage.json
                  token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
              

              Sometimes if I want a higher level interface to tasks that run nox or other things locally, I use taskipy to define them in my pyproject.toml, like:

              [tool.taskipy.tasks]
              fmt = "nox -s fmt"
              lock = "nox -s lock"
              test = "nox -s test test_without_toml typecheck -p 3.12"
              docs = "nox -s render_readme render_api_docs"
              
              • logging_strict@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                26 days ago

                Thanks for the introduction to taskipy. Think if i need macros, Makefile is the way to go. Supports running targets in parallel and i like performing a check to ensure the virtual environment is activated or the command won’t run.

                .ONESHELL:
                .DEFAULT_GOAL := help
                SHELL := /bin/bash
                APP_NAME := logging_strict
                
                #virtual environment. If 0 issue warning
                #Not activated:0
                #activated: 1
                ifeq ($(VIRTUAL_ENV),)
                $(warning virtualenv not activated)
                is_venv =
                else
                is_venv = 1
                VENV_BIN := $(VIRTUAL_ENV)/bin
                VENV_BIN_PYTHON := python3
                PY_X_Y := $(shell $(VENV_BIN_PYTHON) -c 'import platform; t_ver = platform.python_version_tuple(); print(".".join(t_ver[:2]));')
                endif
                
                .PHONY: mypy
                mypy:					## Static type checker (in strict mode)
                ifeq ($(is_venv),1)
                	@$(VENV_BIN_PYTHON) -m mypy -p $(APP_NAME)
                endif
                
                

                make mypy without the virtualenv on will write a warning message why it’s not working!

                • Andy@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  26 days ago

                  Sure, but nox is the closer counterpart for in-venv-task definitions. List “sessions” with -l, pick specific sessions to run with -s.

                  import nox
                  from nox.sessions import Session
                  
                  nox.options.reuse_existing_virtualenvs = True
                  APP_NAME = 'logging_strict'
                  
                  @nox.session(python='3.12')
                  def mypy(session: Session):
                      """Static type checker (in strict mode)"""
                      session.install('-U', 'mypy', '.')
                      session.run('mypy',  '-p', APP_NAME, *session.posargs)
                  

                  Unfortunately it doesn’t currently do any parallel runs, but if anyone wants to track/encourage/contribute in that regard, see nox#544.