• pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 months ago

        The people who helped Trump are the ones who made sure the candidate was an unpopular geriatric, not the people who pointed out that was a bad idea.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Being an unpopular geriatric doesn’t seem to be hurting Trump with his voters. You’re doing the very thing I called out in my comment.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah, the difference is the GOP held a primary, and his voters chose a geriatric. The DNC didn’t hold a primary, and ignored polling that showed their voters didn’t want a geriatric. And since you’ve already admitted you haven’t seen the debate, I don’t actually care about what you’ve, “called out,” in your comment, since you literally don’t know what everyone else here is talking about.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I’ve heard Trump speak. I’ve seen the shit he posts. I didn’t need to see yet another example of him acting like a cracked-out dementia patient to know that’s what he is. I have yet to hear a single criticism of Biden that doesn’t fit Trump to a T.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                You’re welcome to bury your head in the sand if you want, but then you don’t get to talk down to the people who aren’t choosing willful ignorance. Either watch the debate to find out why people are questioning Biden’s fitness or stop talking.

                • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Biden could be a literal corpse and I still wouldn’t understand why anyone thinks Trump is better.

                  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    No one here is saying that, they’re saying that Biden did much worse than Trump in the debate, which is once again making people concerned about his age. And again, you’d understand where they were coming from if you’d actually seen the debate.

    • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Trump could be the youngest presidential candidate in history and he would still be essentially just as bad. Possibly even worse. If Biden didn’t have these excruciating moments where he seems super senior and gets incoherent he would be pretty good. Unless you happen to be a Palestinian obvs.

      Anyway, people have higher standards for Biden and THEY SHOULD.

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      He is too old to run, but he was able to form coherent sentences last night, and Biden couldn’t. Biden lost that debate. HARD. I wish he hadn’t, but he did, and pretending that he didn’t isn’t helping anybody.

      • rigatti@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        The problem is that people are judging who “won” the debate by how confident the candidate sounded rather than, you know, how batshit crazy their positions are (Trump) versus how relatively normal their positions are (Biden).

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          Winning a debate isn’t about who’s position you agree with, it’s about who can create a better argument for their position. I 100% support Biden’s position on abortion over Trump’s, but I have no idea what Biden was trying to say about the 3 times of Roe v. Wade, while Trump’s position (that it should be decided by state law) was completely clear. He also threw in a bunch of lies about how it was an unpopular Supreme Court decision (it was actually a pretty uncontroversial decision I’m 1973), but I understood what he was saying.

          • rigatti@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            I still don’t how you could say Trump presented better arguments for anything. He lives and dies by the non-sequitur. He does, however, project 100% confidence in anything he says. He is a man of confidence. A confidence man.

              • rigatti@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                That video says nothing about the actual content of the debate and who “won”. It’s just saying that Biden was low energy and occasionally incoherent, which I think everyone can agree on. And it’s dangerous because that’s what Republicans have been hammering on since before the last election.

                • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah…those are the reasons Biden lost. He basically validated every claim that he was too old and senile to be President. Like, I don’t know what your definition of winning is here, but being low energy and incoherent is generally considered a bad thing in a debate. You keep bringing up, “content,” like there were objective, correct answers to the questions, but that’s how quiz shows work, not debates. Debates are all about how you present yourself and your arguments, and Biden completely beefed it on both, while Trump was relatively poised and lucid. It was, by pretty much every metric, a stunning defeat.

                  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Your argument is basically that debates are meaningless performances where no rational person should care about who “won”. Which I suppose I agree with, but I don’t consider it a good or even neutral thing. Political debates as they exist now are bad and should never be allowed to happen, because all they do is allow the loudest asshole to look good while distracting voters from anything that matters.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I didn’t see the debate, but calling Trump coherent under any circumstances is very generous. He just spews word salad and bullshit with no regard to the topic he’s supposed to be addressing.

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      People would start talking about it if Biden stepped down and the Dems put up someone under 70. But since we’re comparing him to Joe those sort of critiques don’t hold as much weight.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Thanks for illustrating my point by spewing anti-Biden bullshit while giving Trump a free pass for bent a dottering old moron.

    • blazera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      I tried convincing trump voters hes shit long ago, but every conservative community immediately bans me.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago
      1. They do, but it’s always coupled with a mention of Biden as part of a “both sides” argument
      2. Biden’s age is the most problematic thing about his candidacy. For Trump, it’s the least because it’s overshadowed by so. many. other. problems that are so much worse (being a treasonous fascist, for example).