• Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    But that kid was killed by an attack marked ‘‘to whom it may concern’’, not a focused deliberate attack with his name on it. He was a casualty, not a victim of assassination.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sure allegedly it was to kill someone else that wasnt him, but it sure seems like they just “by chance” killed the son a couple weeks after the father “on accident”.

      But think of it outside of the propaganda; the president was allowed to blow up the wrong person (that happened to be an american minor in a family that had the father killed a couple weeks before) in a country that we are not at war with.