• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you want to bring Joe into this, his own daughter says he showered with her at an old age… So I would care more about an actual accusation as opposed to a random lawsuit in believing biden is worse on this one.

          • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            I tried to look up these accusations from Biden’s daughter but with no success. Do you have any links? Also, if you’re claim that these accusations do exist is true, what makes it more credible to you? How is one woman’s word any less credible than another’s?

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              They are more credible because they were in his daughters diary which people were never supposed to see. Here is a show talking about it if you wish. Also the other lady that he allegedly raped had her mother call Larry King live waaaay back then talking about it. The Trump ones just seem like women wanting attention, and the lady that got the judgement against him is legit crazy.

              • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                I appreciate the follow up link, I will be looking out for more info on that. However, I think you are biased when it comes hearing and believing accusations about sexual abuse from women. Unfortunately for both the accusations against Trump and Biden, we have little more than the women’s words, but you choose to find one more credible than the other because “the Trump ones seem like women wanting attention”. It is sentiments such as those that will continue to allow sexual abusers get away with their actions.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  No, the accusation about Biden was not intended to be known and the other one was not disclosed till years later and was collaborated by a video. The accusations about trump seem to be about the benefit of the accusers and by a crazy person. These are completely different types of accusations, you pretending like they are the same is the part that is biased.

      • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        How many times has bidens name come up along side of Jeffery Epstein? And Trump? I’ll wait for this answer…

        • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          How many times has trumps name come up in his daughters diary for showering with her? I’ll wait for this answer…

            • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Oh yeah, making a bad joke is the same as showering with your daughter… I literally have never showered one time with any of my children because I am not a creep. Politics turn you guys into defenders of probable pedos, hell his son calls him “Pedo Peter”.

              • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                So all of the allegations extending back to the early 90’s about Trump mean absolutely nothing?

                Walking into dressing rooms of 15/16 year old girls. The decades of “bad jokes” of his daughters. Decades if friendship with a known pedo/human trafficker. This doesn’t show his overall character?

                I’m not saying Biden didn’t do it but seriously? Are you unable to comprehend the shitshow that is Donald J Trump?

                Do you think the 34 convictions are a bunch if bullshit? Is he your retribution? Arebyou following a false prophet? I would say yes…

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Donald trump has been one of the most famous people in the world since at least the 90s so they dont mean nothing, but they require scrutiny. And again we are doing a comparison between two people where joe is objectively the one you would want to watch out for. His own son calls him “Pedo Peter” and his daughter implies he is a pedo, I really dont know why you guys are defending him.

                  Do you think the 34 convictions are a bunch if bullshit?

                  Yes, obviously since I am paying attention.

    • enbyecho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      iknowright! I also hear him fuck up big time in a debate once. ClEaRLy TrUmP iS tHe bEtTEr cHOicE!

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        How strange. It’s political gold and the Democrats are just ignoring it. It’s almost like a prominent Democrat might be vulnerable.

        Hint: Rhymes with Bill Clinton

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Fuck that “BoTh SiDeS” whining. I said no such thing. However, Bill Clinton is almost as connected to Epstein as Trump, and that’s just a matter of public record. How is it that everyone seems to forget that he stuck it in a Whitehouse Intern? Whatever else Bill Clinton is, he is a slime ball, but he is still in the bubble of people protected by the Democratic party. There are political consequences to that, whether you want to accept it or not.

            You want to offer an alternative theory about why the press and Democrats aren’t all over this story? They can’t seem to campaign on anything but how truly shitty Trump is, but they ignore this? Make it make sense.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              5 months ago

              Bill Clinton is old fucking news and I don’t care to engage with conspiracy theories other than to deride them

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                A weapon to destroy Trump is lying on the table TODAY and it isn’t being picked up because of that old news. That is why it’s relevant TODAY. Deride it as a conspiracy theory if you want, but it’s not the first time Bill Clinton’s dick has saved Trump in an election.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 months ago
                  1. you really think a single Republican would care about this?

                  2. wtf are you talking about with Bill Clinton’s dick?

            • thefartographer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I feel so bad for Monica Lewinsky and for us as a nation. She was so young, naive, optimistic, and driven. An old man with power took advantage of all of that and ended up ruining her career for a stupid blowie. Granted, she fucked up by telling her friend, but once again, young and naive.

              In the past decade or so, she’s been an incredible speaker and activist and it makes me sadly wonder how different our country would be if she’d stayed in politics. She’s one of those people who I’d love to meet but would be too scared to then learn something disappointing about her.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            I wish. Unlike the Republicans (and apparently a lot of Democrats) I think that there should be consequences for rapists without regard for what party they belong to.

        • riodoro1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Stop criticizing the democrats. They’ve done nothing to wrong you.

          Because thats what they are good at.

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    Facing increased scrutiny for raping children is appropriate. Also appropriate , facing 15 years in prison for raping children. Of course unless it was an official act by the president.

    • Heikki@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Technically, if he obstructed the case while president by ordering his DOJ to drop it or obviscate it, it could be considered an official act.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    the person that authored the article is named “STAFF WRITER” which I support using.

    the story is not the author’s identity.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    Conservatives are A+ 100% OK with raping a child, even with violence. Their religion does not oppose it and neither does their political leadership.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    Renewed scrutiny huh?

    I want to know why the scrutiny needed to be renewed. Why did scrutiny diminish under these kinds of allegations?

    I can see from the comments something about this being affected by him becoming president, and I’m left here thinking, shouldn’t the FBI/CIA/enforcement agencies, be able to operate without the president getting all up in their business?

    That’s just sad, honestly. I won’t assume Trump is guilty until he is convicted of the crime, but there should be nothing that can prevent law enforcement from fully investigating what happened and providing justice for that girl.

    The fact that this is a headline at all is pretty dark.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Okay, question: NOW??!!

    Fuck that guy with a red hot poker but this is an issue NOW??!!

    prediction: nothing will come of this because it’s a weak attempt at electoral October Surprising