- cross-posted to:
- usa@lemmy.ml
He could Rape a 13 Year Old on 5th Avenue and I would STILL VOTE FOR HIM (because I want Trans Kids to Kill Themselves! And Mexicans!)! Pro Life! Save The Children!
A lot of them DON’T WANT trans kids to kill themselves, or immigrants, or whatever.
A scary amount WANT TO DO THE KILLING.
Save the children for Trump! Stop the immigrants from JD Couch molester!
Trump for Aztec emperor of women’s bodies and weirdo party couches! Let’s go with the worst president by all metrics in all of US history! Why? Inbreeding! Who? All of us. The problem with kids these days is not enough huffing of leaded gasoline!
As one ought.
I mean, I’d expect one to face a little more than “scrutiny,” but here we are.
Just one? There’s gotta be more. Trump doesn’t strike me as the type of fella that would stop after only raping one 13 year old.
Thanks hero
ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ
deleted by creator
Now That’s Family Values^TM
Removed by mod
Except for the allegation by said rape victim who recanted it due to being attacked.
Removed by mod
Isn’t trump a pedo for sure though? He’s been to Epstein island how many times?
The only proof I needed were his disgusting comments about his own daughter.
. Having proof Trump is a pedo obviously helps Democrats
I see “creep” there, for sure.
It doesn’t help dems. maga doesn’t give a fuck. He could kill someone while raping a kid in broad daylight on camera and they’d still support him. The only this it might do is help put him in jail AND EVEN THAT is spurious. Which is fucking insane.
Honestly don’t care for it as ammunition against him I was always just angry about the idea of it as a whole. If he did and if he didn’t couldn’t change my opinion of his character as a whole. But he was always chummy with Epstein, is listed as doe whatever # and every single person who took that plane is complacent in something deep enough for jail time.
*edit Epstein stupid phone
Unsubstantiated by Snopes is not the same as false.
“no evidence”, it says.
Yes, unsubstantiated means “no evidence.”
As the saying goes, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
“…so really, who’s to say they’re not eating cats? After all, absence of evidence is not…”
Does he actually, though? Haven’t really seen this mentioned at all recently from any reputable news source or the Harris campaign.
led some users to mistakenly believe it was a recent development.
Come on. What about all those CDs in Epstein’s safe?