• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    We’re getting establishment bullshit no matter what. May as well have establishment bullshit that can beat Trump.

    • hypnoton@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      But just passively accepting the establishment bullshit while not even voicing displeasure is a recipe for more and more severe establishment bullshit.

      If the billionaire fucks are shoving turds into our throats while calling those smelly turds “brownies,” at least they need to hear us moan. We don’t gotta dignify this bullshit with polite smiles all around.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        But just passively accepting the establishment bullshit while not even voicing displeasure

        Check my comment history and tell me if that seems like an apt description of my behavior.

        • hypnoton@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Comrade, I got nothing personal against you or your conduct. I just mean to say we need to encourage complaints and suggestions which may seem unrealistic but which still point us in the right spiritual direction so to speak.

          Then if you can add some actionable refinement or sharpen the complaints to make them better articulated, so much the better.

          On the other hand if you just discourage, even with “good intentions”, you’re blocking the energy.

          The status quo candidates just won’t do.

          We need a candidate with an affirmative, POSITIVE VISION for America. “The status quo is fine, we’ll just do little tweaks around the edges because we don’t wanna upset our billionaire donors” is NOT a positive vision for America. It just WILL NOT DO.

          Simply defeating Trump with just any warm body isn’t good enough.

          Our real task is not to defeat Trump, but to BUILD a positive future for us all. Our task is to foster a world we actually want to live in, as opposed to this craptacular capitalist hellscape.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Simply defeating Trump with just any warm body isn’t good enough.

            Well, the party isn’t willing to do better and I’d be happy if they put up someone who can beat him. That person isn’t Biden. Of course, I would also like it if the party would stop enabling genocide and move to the fucking left for the first time in fifty goddamned years, but I’ll take what I can get.

            A good first step would be for the party to admit they made a mistake. If the party can’t take that first step, they’re never gonna stop interpreting all events as evidence that they need to move to the right.

            • hypnoton@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Begging the party won’t help.

              It’s our job to COERCE the party to do our bidding. The party must know if they displease their voters there are meaningful risks and downsides for them. It’s our duty to engineer those meaningful risks and downsides or else the party has every reason to ignore us.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                At the moment, we’re dealing with a party that would rather lose than listen. I want to get them to listen.

                • hypnoton@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  If you engineer meaningful risks and consequences for the party, they will HAVE to listen to you.

                  If you only plan to beg them politely, they could choose to ignore you. Whether or not they listened to you in this case would be completely at the pleasure of the party.