• Aux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 年前

    Military losses are not part of the civilian gun deaths. Ukraine lost only 10k civilians over two years. That’s 133 deaths per 1m. Mississippi is more dangerous than an active war zone, that’s a fact.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      And that’s not even the only comparison.

      https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/10/31/1209683893/how-the-u-s-gun-violence-death-rate-compares-with-the-rest-of-the-world

      US gun violence rate higher than nearly all Sub-Saharan countries, which are among the world’s poorest.

      When casualties of military conflicts are factored out, the US gun violence rate is higher than even countries in conflict ridden regions like the Mid-East

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Saying Ukraine during an active war which already had lower civilian gun deaths than the usa and then saying “no that’s not what I meant” is hilarious. It’s like if Germany or Poland were invaded and you said the same thing. You’re post is pointless.

        • SupraMario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          Ukraine pre-war already had a lower firearm homicide rate than the US…on top of that, they armed a huge portion of their population when they were invaded…so your point is even worse since they gave out literal assault rifles to civilians and their firearm homicide rate was still lower… sounds like its not the guns.

            • SupraMario@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 年前

              Lol yea safer and they handed out rifles to civilians…so what is it? Is it the guns still or not? Because last I checked militaries fight each other with real guns, not nerf.