The judge in former U.S. President Donald Trump’s upcoming trial over his handling of classified documents made two key errors in a June trial, one of which violated a fundamental constitutional right of the defendant and could have invalidated the proceedings, according to legal experts and a court transcript.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you read the article?

    These were very basic mistakes that she made and despite your essay the article just pointed them out.

    Like the media should. It’s not like they drew devil horns on her picture or are saying she’s an activist judge or anything.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, I did read the article. I am speaking more generally regarding the circulating media narratives I have seen regarding her being an activist judge. That may well be the case, and I am willing to accept that if and when the evidence warrants it. I also wrote my initial “essay” as you put it in support of the OP who I believe was engaging in good faith, and therefore wished to support. After that I admit to being verbose in my responses to you, and I understand if that is not your preferred method of discourse.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait, so you’re just generally criticizing the media?

        This isn’t to do with this article?

        I subscribe to a clear and concise form of communication.

        ‘I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time.’

        • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Again, my initiation into this discussion was originally directed towards supporting the OP of this comment thread.

          I’m going to leave it here. Thanks for being reasonable, and not antagonistic. I appreciated the discussion. Hope to see you around ✌️